Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
parenting
»
government
2008 Elections
abortion
advocate
America
Barack Obama
big brother
breastfeeding
California
children
church and state
Civil Rights
Congress
conservatism
Constitution
conviction
courts
CSPAN
democracy
Democrats
discrimination
Education
elections
Equal Parenting
equality
ethics
exams
extremist
facts
faith healing
Family Law
fantetti-fathers-rights-ohio-council-dahlia
fathers' rights
feminism
forensic science
Fray
free speech
Freedom
fundamentalism
God is an American.
governor
GW BUSH
hillary clinton
History
holocaust
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=4EbpHpnJL2E
impeach scalia
Journalism
judiciary
justice
Justice department
Law
law school
lawyers
Leave it to the academics cont...
legislature
Let's not twist the Constitution
libertarians
Luddites
media
medicine
mental health
modesty
multiculturalism
murder
Politics
prenuptial
presidency
privacy
private
procedure
Propaganda
prosecution
Prostitution
protest
punishment
race
racism
religion
religion in government
Republican
responsibility
Right About Anti-Father Bias
rights
rule of law
safety
Sandra Day O'Connor
Scalia
science
secrecy
secrets
Senate
Sexuality
South Dakota Abortion Law
Soviet Union
subversion
Supreme Court
Teachers
The Biggest Scandal of All
the judges are bad: bigotted and biased against fathers
The presumption favoring full joint custody only applies when the parents jointly petition the court for it---in which case it's usually granted.
Re: No, no, no, no and can I say this again? No!
Without getting into the whole Religion vs Science debate, we as a society must be very, very careful how we deal with this issue. While reasonable individuals such as ourselves feel that this is a clear cut case of child endangerment, we are crossing a very fuzzy line. Leaving aside the specifics of this situation, at what point do parents' ...
Posted to
Human Nature
by
Pelander
on
January 22, 2009
Dahlia Lithwick Uses Recipes to Write a Legal Column About..
... ABORTION. Lithwick's very idea that women do not have reproductive choice, if they cannot extinquish the life growing in their own wombs, is in and of itself faulty. I mean, my God, did the female have sex with the guy, or did she not? As to being ''for change'' in everything but pro-Abort American policies at home and abroad, not everyone ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
MichaelBernard2
on
August 21, 2008