The Fray
Campaign 2008
News & Politics
Arts & Life
Business & Tech
Health & Science
Style & Shopping
Travel & Food
Sports
Slate
on NPR
NEWSLETTERS
PODCASTS
RSS
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
habeas corpus
Constitution
Death Penalty
democracy
The Wire
So being an American citizen doesn't get you much?
So I guess this means that if you're unfortunate enough to be an American citizen in a foreign country a.k.a Iraq, you're bascially screwed and no better than those pesky insurgents who keep blowing up things. Let me see, if I have my passport and birth certificate that states that I was stupid enough to be born here, then I automatically wave my ...
Posted to
Supreme Court Dispatches
by
curveball
on
March 26, 2008
Munaf and Omar Cont'd
How did the original Latin writ read? If I remember correctly, it was an order to the official holding the prisoner to bring the prisoner before the King's court for disposition. I guess that by Coke's time this routinely meant releasing the prisoner from custody. But need it mean this? Perhaps the District Courts could order their respective ...
Posted to
Convictions Archive
by
bluehorse
on
March 24, 2008
A New Writ: Please detain me!
How did the original Latin writ read? If I remember correctly, it was an order to the official holding the prisoner to bring the prisoner before the King's court for disposition. I guess that by Coke's time this routinely meant releasing the prisoner from custody. But need it mean this? Perhaps the District Courts could order their respective ...
Posted to
Convictions Archive
by
bluehorse
on
March 24, 2008
Please Detain Me
How did the original Latin writ read? If I remember correctly, it was an order to the official holding the prisoner to bring the prisoner before the King's court for disposition. I guess that by Coke's time this routinely meant releasing the prisoner from custody. But need it mean this? Perhaps the District Courts could order their respective ...
Posted to
Convictions Archive
by
bluehorse
on
March 24, 2008
The rights of enemy combatants
I think a point is being missed. To my knowledge, the individuals being detained are not accused of being criminals, but of being combatants. To say that they should be ''charged with their crimes or released'' is therefore a misnomer. It is not generally considered to be a crime to be a soldier against another country. At the same time, ...
Posted to
Supreme Court Dispatches
by
The McLush
on
December 6, 2007
the bigger point
When our forefathers declared their independence from England the rhetoric they used was widely encompassing. ''All men are created equal'' they said, and have god given, ''unalienable rights''. They were not simply taking the prvilidges which were withheld from them by King George. They were claiming that they and every other person on ...
Posted to
Supreme Court Dispatches
by
bellerophon3
on
December 6, 2007