Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
data
advertising
alumni
approach
bias
boys
Caitlin Knowles Myers
capitalism
Causation
clothing
coffee
corporatism
Correlation
credibility
discrimination
dissent
East Asian
economics
economists
evidence
health insurance
insurance
men
philanthropy
Sallie Baliunas
sex
sexism
shopping
socialism
stigma
The Dismal Science
Credible vs. non-credible dissent
Rosenbaum fails to mention that journalists also have a responsibility to distinguish credible dissent from non-credible dissent. Admittedly, Einstein's theories were initially considered wacko...but they were based on a new way of looking at the world, examining results that scientists had previously discounted or not paid attention to, such as ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
Tocqueville
on
August 9, 2008
Sex evidence and Statistics
I read both ''The Normalization of Oral Sex'' and ''Open-mouthed wonder,'' and I think that when responding to criticisms of the prevalence of oral sex in the past, William Saletan, you could have been more explicit about the scope and nature of your evidence. The evidence to which you refer is no older than 1970, and you do not explicitly cite ...
Posted to
Human Nature
by
textguru44
on
June 12, 2008
Concise explanation of statistical errors
Given a response variable (y) and two control variables (x1, x2). Assume the following model: y = a1*x1 + a2*x2 + a3*(x1*x2) Suppose your statistical test show that a1, a2, and a3 all significantly different than zero. The next appropriate step is to test for differences between x1 at a constant value of x2. That way one can determine if a ...
Posted to
The Undercover Economist
by
Adam
on
November 23, 2007
Discrimination, Grocery stores and Nubile Baggirls
I'm outraged. After an exhaustive statistical study, I've uncovered a corporate prejudice which suggests systemic sexual discrimination the likes of which could be nationwide!!!!! As a frequent customer to a regional grocery store deemed superior to the Walmarts and Safeways in service (which naturally translates into higher prices), I have ...
Posted to
The Undercover Economist
by
Usama2
on
November 22, 2007
must KNOW SELF to know desired
At twenty suttin, I've been with and around many different ages and races, which exposes a wide range of preferences and dating desires. I conclude and still discuss with many singles, that most women don't ''find'' the men they are looking for because they don't know what they want; they don't know what they want because they don't know ...
Posted to
The Dismal Science
by
In Charge
on
November 12, 2007
Poor research method
I read the original article that tries to draw this conclusion, and I'm more than a little disappointed in the quality of the methodology. This was a pilot study at best. There are problems with sample selection, sample size, data collection, and data analysis -- basically all aspects of the study. The coffee shops were admittedly not selected ...
Posted to
The Undercover Economist
by
flora8
on
November 11, 2007
A Slate editor solves the mysteries of headline writing.
I think it's safe to say that those of us who saw the caption ''The Myth of the Asian Fetish'' on the front page (which will be gone in a few days or less) have been had. It's worth noting here that titles in Slate often (always?) contain puns, offensive references, or misleading nonsense designed to draw you in rather than accurately describe ...
Posted to
The Dismal Science
by
haulinsacs
on
November 9, 2007
short term vs long term in the healthcare biz
i didn't realize this was news; it's considered a truism in the healthcare insurance industry that you get about 50% turnover every two years. with those kind of numbers, it's in fact to the benefit of the companies that they Do the Right Thing and spend money on disease management programs for patients who will not be members of the same company ...
Posted to
The Dismal Science
by
gzuckier
on
September 7, 2007
The data is irrelevant.
If you'd included some statistics comparing admission rates to giving rates, your claim might have a chance at legitimacy. Perhaps alumni give when their children approach college because they hope that the improvements made to the school with their money will make the school a better place for their kids. And to say that schools need money is ...
Posted to
The Dismal Science
by
Verily
on
July 9, 2007