Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
contracts
“little people“
“mob rule“
“rule of law“
90% tax bracket
activism
AIG
anger
bailout money
bonuses
boy scouts
CitiGroup
commodities
constitution
economy
Edward Liddy
Federal
finance
financial
financial products
gays
Greenberg
Hartford
House of Representatives
Jake DeSantis
London
lynch-mob
Merrill-Lynch
money
paid off
pitchforks
politics
resignation letter
retention
Spitzer
toxic assets
UBS
witch-hunt
We Should Have A “Which” Hunt Instead of A Witch-Hunt
I told you so. One has to be selective about whom at AIG to direct our “bonus anger”. As “Exhibit A” I give you the resignation letter of Jake DeSantis, an executive vice president of AIG’s Financial Products unit, to AIG president Edward Liddy, which appears as an op-ed in today’s New York Times. Quoting from his letter: “I started at this ...
Posted to
Today's Papers
by
mathpol
on
March 25, 2009
The Merrill-Lynch-Mob
Welcome to mob rule, as orchestrated by the House of Representatives, who yesterday created a “bonus tax bracket” of 90% on bonuses paid by certain companies receiving Federal Bailout money. Forget about contracts, the rule of law, the fact that Eliot Spitzer engineered the departure of longtime AIG chief Maurice Greenberg by threatening a ...
Posted to
Today's Papers
by
mathpol
on
March 20, 2009
Re: Legal talk
But the point of the City's actions isn't to make the BSA accept gays -- the Supreme Court already struck down a similar New Jersey law in BSA v. Dale. The City wants to raise the rent, which is financial, and is therefore barred.
Posted to
Hot Document
by
Silent Cal
on
October 25, 2007
Re: Legal talk
You're right that the Philadelphia law is a law of general application. Does that make it exempt from the Contract Clause? If, in United States Trust Co., the state had instead passed a law that repealed all transportation laws, would the voiding of the contract have been valid? It still would have impaired the obligation of contract in ...
Posted to
Hot Document
by
Silent Cal
on
October 25, 2007
Legal talk
Ok let's straighten out a few things: -It's not ''ex ipso facto,'' it's ''ex post facto'', and it's relevant to criminal punishment, not contract law. -The Rule Against Perpetuities applies to conveyances, not contracts, and in any case has an exception for charities, such as the BSA. In addition, the Rule was repealed in Pennsylvania in ...
Posted to
Hot Document
by
Silent Cal
on
October 24, 2007
BSA policies and procedures
The BSA has struggled for decades with its sense of responsibility (as have public education and religious organizations) for protecting its immature and/or impressionable members from possible exposure or exploitation by practicing pedophiles (or atheists, militarists, religious zealots, murderers, etc.). Excesses have attended policy definition, ...
Posted to
Hot Document
by
Bruce Gruber
on
October 24, 2007
ok, but do they atleast get it back?
It looks like to me that a gentlemen's contract was formed between the city and the boy scouts of america (bsa) in wich bsa agreed to give the city the structure so long as the city allowed the bsa rent-free access to the structure. At the time i'm assuming there was no underlying statement that the bsa could continue to do so as long as they ...
Posted to
Hot Document
by
Ferdoc
on
October 24, 2007
The BSA and the Obligation of Contract
According to this article, ''[t]he Boy Scouts built the historic structure in 1928 and then deeded it to the city, which in exchange agreed to let the scouts use it in perpetuity rent-free.'' If the city really did agree to let the Scouts use the building rent-free in perpetuity in exchange for deeding the building to the city, this is a ...
Posted to
Hot Document
by
Silent Cal
on
October 24, 2007