Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
climate change
»
global warming
air travel co2 emissions reductions pollutions global warming
Al Gore
apathy
asperger's syndrome
autism
autism television
Autismtism
bandwagon
blogging
books
borders
business
capitalism
carbon
carbon footprints
cars
causation
children
climate
climatologists
climatology
coffee
conservation
Conservatives
CONSREVATIVE liberal fear
consumerism
consumption
corn
corporations
correlation
cotton
creationism
credibility
cyclones
ddt
deceit
disney
dissent
Doomsday
dot earth
eco-friendly
ecology
economics
economy
Ecosystem
education
electric cars
elitism
energy
Environment
environment green
environmentalism
evolution
Foreign Legion
future
gifts
global warming climate change naysayers science integrity
green
greenhouse effect
Illegals
immigration
Liberals
medicaid
methane
Mexico
oil shortage
OPEC
Overpopulation
parenting
pixar
politics
pollution
pollution rating
Population Control
prius
Progressives
qualifications
rachel carson
recycling
refuted evidence
Religion
revenue
revkin
rhetoric
ron rosenbaum
rosenbaum
science
Scientific truth
selfishness
skeptics
Tangled Web
texas
transportation
Truth
violence
wall e
walle
Wall-E
water
wool
Eco Doom & Gloom Predictions Usually Wrong
Mr. Sptizer declares that the Chamber of Commerce ''has been wrong on virtually every major public-policy issue of the past decade''. Funny, but environmental activists have been wrong for the past FOUR decades yet Mr. Spitzer appears to feel they aren't to be questioned (in his view, this is apparently one of the Chamber's biggest sins). Back ...
Posted to
The Best Policy
by
TripodGirl
on
October 16, 2009
climate change
We are in the depths of this worsening recession. Climate change, for now, is not a priority. Just ask the 20 million Americans out of work.
Posted to
Politics
by
david wayne osedach
on
July 9, 2009
Air travel is hard to offset
The problem with air travel is that it much more polluting than driving and you go much longer distances. Most estimates say air travel produces more than half a pounds of CO2 per mile per passenger. Of course this depends on a lot of factors such as how full the plane is, but the airline industry uses cheap, dirty fuels and they are incredibly ...
Posted to
The Green Lantern
by
Intersection
on
December 23, 2008
Shoddy Science Reporting Complicit in Anti-Intellectualism
Because of the sensationalism committed by science reporters, American's mistrust of science has been amplified. Without bothering to explain the process of science, and the need for replications of studies, and without stressing all the follow-up work required to verify a scientific position or statement, science reporters and the news outlets ...
Posted to
Science
by
rjgwood
on
November 18, 2008
Is Landsburg for real?
As with any of Professor Landsburg’s arguments, the logic is impeccable, he’s a clever chap. But as with any logical derivation, it is the initial assumptions from which the conclusions are drawn about which we should be wary. In the case of this article, the implicit assumption revolves around just exactly who counts in future generations. The ...
Posted to
Everyday Economics
by
moresexplease
on
September 15, 2008
Re: Global warming and hurricanes
Did you see this? Strongest Storms Growing Stronger Yet, Study Says, from the New York Times today. The study was published in the journal Nature. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/04/science/04cyclone.html?_r=1&oref=slogin The problem lies in citing one study to make a point. That's not how science works, and any intellectually honest ...
Posted to
Books
by
Mae.Stevens
on
September 10, 2008
Rising Smugness Swamps all Reason
Clearly - according to Fraywatch - all is well in the Eco-Temple. Hate to break-up the prayer circle, but - for the record - there is no scientific consensus on the catastrophic effects of climate change, and - actually - there can be no purely scientific consensus, because the effects will be in the space where the natural world, the economic ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
Marcus61
on
August 15, 2008
Re: A Response from Andrew Revkin
Beautifully stated! The science issues are: i) whether or not we have anthropogenic CO2 mediated global warming (settled in the affirmative); ii) what the magnitude and varied impacts of this warming will be (not settled). The complementary policy issue is what - if anything - should be done about this. As a layman, I'd be happy to restrict my ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
Marcus61
on
August 11, 2008
Climate science and dissent
I had other plans for this morning, but the article by Rosenbaum and the subsequent discussion are too interesting to ignore (thanks, Matt, for the link). As a climate scientist (30 years of active research in government laboratories and academia and more than 200 peer-reviewed publications), professor, and lecturer on global climate, the ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
Climate.guy
on
August 11, 2008
Global warming consensus: bait and switch
Whether or not we experiencing anthropogenic climate change is not the interesting or difficult issue; rather, what could or should be done to adapt to, or prevent global change - of all sorts, not just climate mediated change - is where we should have information, and debate. But the consensus-mongers among us are trying to push the view that ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
Marcus61
on
August 10, 2008
1
2
3
4
5
Next >
...
Last »