Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
climate change
»
dissent
climate
credibility
Doomsday
elitism
environment
future
global warming
global warming climate change naysayers scientific method
global warming climate change naysayers scientific method
global warming climate change naysayers science integrity
politics
qualifications
Religion
revkin
ron rosenbaum
rosenbaum
Scientific truth
skeptics
Rising Smugness Swamps all Reason
Clearly - according to Fraywatch - all is well in the Eco-Temple. Hate to break-up the prayer circle, but - for the record - there is no scientific consensus on the catastrophic effects of climate change, and - actually - there can be no purely scientific consensus, because the effects will be in the space where the natural world, the economic ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
Marcus61
on
August 15, 2008
Global warming consensus: bait and switch
Whether or not we experiencing anthropogenic climate change is not the interesting or difficult issue; rather, what could or should be done to adapt to, or prevent global change - of all sorts, not just climate mediated change - is where we should have information, and debate. But the consensus-mongers among us are trying to push the view that ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
Marcus61
on
August 10, 2008
Comments on article and discussion
Interesting discussion. I work in the field of computer modeling of nonlinear physical phenomena, although not in the particular field of climate modeling (my PhD is in physics). Every month or so I do a quick review of some of the literature concerning the climate debate. Thank you, Ron, for a nice article on the subject of reporting ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
colorless.blue.ideas
on
August 9, 2008