Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
christopher hit...
»
Osama bin Laden
2008 Elections
Afghanistan
al Qaeda
Alexander the Great
america
American empire
Applebaum
atheism
authority
Banging the war drums
BBC
Benazir Bhutto
Bill Clinton
Bill O'Reilly
Britain
British
Bush
Bush Administration
capitalism
CIA
colonialism
communism
constitution
Constitutionalism
conviction
Culture
curmedgeon
democracy
Dick Cheney
diplomacy
domestic violence
elections
empire
England
enlightenment
Enough
equality
ethics
Europe
Evil
fascism
federalism
Feith
Fighting Words
foreign policy
Fox News
framing
Freedom
fundamentalism
generals
Genius
genocide
George W. Bush
God
GOP
guns
history
Hitchens
Hitchens Pakistan CIA
Imperialism
iraq
Iraq War
Islam
islamists
Islamofascism
Islamophobia
media
Middle East
military
monotheism
morality
Nation
nation building
New York Post
oil
Pakistan
palestine
peace
peacekeeping
Pentagon
Politics
presidency
terrorism
terrorists
theocracy
tolerance
Tony Blair
Truth
Turkey
Tyranny
USA Pakistan Iran terrorism
victory
war
War on Terror
waste
withdrawal
Wolfowitz
World
World War
zarqawi
The Great Game -- Anglo Amero Brits and Kamchatka!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waziristan Honestly, I do not know why it is, that I both love to read Christopher Hitchens every week, and disagree with his every point almost without exception. Maybe it is his ''the sun never sets on the British Empire'' world girdling perapatetic meanderings around the World Map of Current Events and political ...
Posted to
Fighting Words
by
MichaelBernard2
on
September 19, 2008
The loss of Zimbabwe and South Africa to the Reds . . .
. . . compares favorably with the loss of Afghanistan, Tibet, Hong Kong, and China to the Socialist/Communist ideologues elsewhere. Of course, the Anglo-American world Realpolitik has suffered it's share of losses to Right Wing Ideologue regimes, as well. Look no further than France, Italy, and Iran among others. We could even mention America in ...
Posted to
Fighting Words
by
MichaelBernard1
on
April 21, 2008
Hitch, The Brits Started This Mess, Along With Reagan
Christopher Hitchens engages in breathtaking and broad stroke, decades long perspective in cataloguing the burning of world war through the 20th Century, from the beginnings of World War One through World War Two through to the conclusion of the Cold War, to the collapse of the Berlin Wall. Yet he dates this Iraqi Twin War Conflict only to 2003? ...
Posted to
Politics
by
MichaelBernard1
on
March 25, 2008
As viewed from Britain
I have followed US Politics closely since I was in my teens. There are reasons for this, starting with My Lai, and much reinforced by my perception, at age seventeen, that Richard Nixon was crazy enough to start a nuclear war to create an insane distraction from Watergate. That scared me badly and it was years before I got over it Anyway, ...
Posted to
Foreigners
by
anarch
on
October 2, 2007
al Qaeda's relevance to AQIZ
Mr. Hitchens, Isn't saying that al Qaeda in Iraq (assisted by Hassan Ghul, Abdul Hadi al Iraqi, al Masri and others closely linked to Zawahiri) not being associated with al Qaeda in Pak/Afghanistan almost as ludicrious as saying the U.S. military in Iraq isn't really part of the U.S. military in the U.S.? I certainly am not the first to make ...
Posted to
Fighting Words
by
ikez78
on
August 14, 2007
the hitch(ens) in your theory is this...
You consistently defend the action in Iraq, as being a fight against the al Qaida. That defeating the al Qaida is the ultimate goal. Okay, a legitimate goal, and argued well enough...except you incomprehensibly fall into the same trap as all the neo-cons who started the war! You place no value on the heads of bin Laden or al Zawahiri. How is ...
Posted to
Fighting Words
by
Didereaux
on
August 14, 2007