Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
children
»
Global warming
Al Gore
carbon
Christianity
climate change
Conceited
consumerism
consumption
corporate greed
Economics
Ecosystem
energy
Environment
environmentalism
evolution
fat
Garbage
green
health
immigrant
money
obesity
Over-weight Wall-e
personal responsibility
pixar
Population Control
taxes
violence
wall e
Wall-E
Regarding the Wall-E article...
''Wall-E tells us that if we don't change the way we live, we'll all get really fat and destroy the world.'' You'll find no bigger supporter of the first amendment than me. However, I think the statement above, quoted from the article is a little biased. To me, it sounds like someone who is just looking for a reason to look down on ...
Posted to
Green Room
by
CWickham
on
July 11, 2008
Re: Original Sin
Hooray! Someone is telling it as the environmental problem really is, that humans will consume and produce waste no matter what. Of course the more humans, the more consumption and waste. Not just Americans need to control population growth but every country and immigrant on the planet. We can ill afford the environmental and economical impact.
Posted to
Green Room
by
mtnsshore
on
September 14, 2007
Re: Tax Break for the Childless/Tax Large Families
''Why do we in the US get to deduct more from our taxes for each dependant (child) that we have when more children require more resources from our governments?'' Ummm, because more children become more workers who in turn become more taxpayers, who in turn support people through social welfare programs? Duh. Look at the situation today - there ...
Posted to
Green Room
by
jasonmalcolmiii
on
September 13, 2007
a modest proposal
One idea I rarely see mentioned in these discussions is the importance of delayed reproduction. This is just a matter of logic - think of it this way: scenario A: a couple who has two children when they are 20ish will have 16 descendents after 80 years, assuming their descendents follow the same pattern scenario B: a couple who has two children ...
Posted to
Green Room
by
SIgh
on
September 13, 2007