enter the fray: our reader discussion forum

The Fray

Browse by Tags

Advanced

All Tags » abortion » Catholic Church

Re: Nidal Hassan Motivated By Islam? Groundbreaking!
Clarity of thought is groundbreaking. Not tongue in cheek as the bournite posts, but ground breaking words by Hitchens because of decades of censorship of real Atheist insight. If Atheists write it, it must be wrong according to religious ...
Posted to Fighting Words by AmericanAtheistNavyVet on November 19, 2009
Wow -- What a Rant by "Rage Boy" Chris Hitch Today
I am perfectly content, really quite happy, about Obama's decision to have this mega-Church author, pastor, and cultural figure, Rick Warren, give the prayer at the January 20th Inauguration of our new United States President. I understand the apoplexy of ''Rage Boy'' Christopher Hitchens at the very thought of a prayer being said, let alone a ...
Posted to Fighting Words by MichaelBernard3 on December 29, 2008
Re: something that is never mentioned
Irrespective of whether you are attempting to be truthful, or attempting to be insulting; and irrespective of whether or not you have a basis to believe I called you an immoral baby killer, (I don't think I did, but you believe I did) lets move on to the more important subject of the book I recommended. Facts are facts... Here's an ...
Posted to XX Factor Extra by Chauffeurkp on November 26, 2008
Re: something that is never mentioned
Are you sure you were looking at an ultra sound and not a video? Was the machine probe pointed at her uterus? Fingers and toes are DEFINITELY visible during the late end of the first trimester when most abortions are performed. Yet, what you saw and describe doesn't surprise me. PP isn't really interested in presenting ''choices''. Choose any ...
Posted to XX Factor Extra by Chauffeurkp on November 26, 2008
Re: Catholic Hypocrisy
HI Cassandra, Where I work, we have some large printing equipment. A woman who knew I was pro-life approached me and asked me to make her a sign that read ''I regret my abortion, ask me why'' She wanted the sign to use as she protested at an abortion mill. So when I made the sign for her, I asked her why. She said that she knows she killed ...
Posted to XX Factor Extra by Chauffeurkp on November 26, 2008
Re: something that is never mentioned
Well you need to read some more then. Your emotions cloud your reasoning. If in fact you have an education, then you know (particularly as an ethicist) that uncontrolled outbursts are a sure sign of a hidden problem. I'm guessing involvement in an abortion. But maybe not. But surely, if that's the case, you'd have to agree that your ability ...
Posted to XX Factor Extra by Chauffeurkp on November 25, 2008
Re: Catholic hospitals and FOCA
higgsboson wrote: I do wish people who write for public consumption would stop using the euphonious match for ''pro-choice'', and simply call themselves ''anti-abortion''. Because that is what they are. Funny God Particle, but I wish people like you who call yourself ''pro-choice'' would use the correct term ''pro-abortion'' because that is ...
Posted to XX Factor Extra by Chauffeurkp on November 25, 2008
Re: something that is never mentioned
HA! You've fallen for the hype that ''It's just a blob of tissue.'' of ''A bunch of cells.'' But let's just assume (for a moment) that this is true (as you think) during the first trimester. Are you then in agreement that abortion is wrong in subsequent trimesters? Here's a link about fetal development ...
Posted to XX Factor Extra by Chauffeurkp on November 25, 2008
Re: something that is never mentioned
Check your facts folks. PP does NOT encourage or promote adoption. IF they did ''Planned'' ''Parenthood'' would be a natural segway toward adoption and offer the services themselves. But they're not really planning parenthood for anybody. Interestingly enough, the Crisis Pregnancy Centers who DO promote adoption are on PP's target list. ...
Posted to XX Factor Extra by Chauffeurkp on November 25, 2008
Re: Too Silly for Words
Amazing how silly our government can be..... Here's an excerpt from Wikipedia about the Dred Scott Decision... Dred Scott v. Sandford,[1] 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court that ruled that people of African descent imported into the United States and held as slaves, or their descendants[2]—whether or ...
Posted to XX Factor Extra by Chauffeurkp on November 25, 2008

1 2 Next >