Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
John Roberts
2008 Elections
2008 Primaries
abortion
abu ghraib
ACLU
activism
Addington
affirmative action
Alberto Gonzalez
Alito
America
Antonin Scalia
ashcroft
attorney general
authoritarianism
Bad Apples
Barack Obama
big brother
blue laws
Blue States
Bob Dylan
bong hits 4 jesus
breastfeeding
Brinkley
Bush
Bush Administration
Bush Bashers Anonymous
celebrity
censorship
cheney
church and state
CIA
Civil Rights
Clarence thomas
Cold War
commoners
competence
Congress
conservatism
Constitution
conviction
corruption
courts
crime
Criminal justice
Daily Show
democracy
Democratic primary
Democrats
detention centers
Dick Cheney
dissent
due process
education
elections
executive order
Executive privilege
extremist
facts
fascism
feminism
FISA
Four Horsemen
free speech
Freedom
government
ideology
judiciary
legislature
libertarians
police
Politics
premises
president
primaries
prosecution
protest
punishment
racial descrimination New Haven
reason
redaction
religion
Republican
responsibility
rights
Roberts
Ron Paul
rule of law
Scalia
SCOTUS
secrecy
segregation
Senate
society
Supreme Court
torture
torture Bush war crimes Constitution
toture
TREASON
United States
Supreme Court message to Sotomayor
The firemens' case is now closed, Promotional test's reimposed; The High Court's recision Of this one decision Tells Sotomayor she'll get hosed. News Short n' Sweet by JFD8 http://twitter.com/JFD8
Posted to
The Breakfast Table
by
JD8
on
June 29, 2009
Great Review of Some Important Books . . .
. . . BOOKS which I think all Americans need to read and consider: Making Government Work, by Fritz Hollings Torture Team: Rumsfeld's Memo and the Betrayal of American Values, by Phillipe Sands The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned Into a War on American Ideals (Hardcover), by Jane Mayer. Terrorism and Democracy ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
MichaelBernard1
on
July 28, 2008
Government abuse of power
South Dakotas law relating to doctor patient communication and abortion: This is just another method for people using and abusing government power. They attempt to control others and legislate morality by forcing their beliefs (usually based on their religion) upon all of society. Their goal is to limit freedom and force conformity with their ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
den99md
on
July 4, 2008
I thought it was...
''when you ain't got nothin', you ain't got nothin' to lose.'' That's the way I sing it, anyhow. What, Roberts didn't want people to be able to search Supreme Court opinions for the word ''ain't'' and come up with his opinions?
Posted to
The Breakfast Table
by
jibeaux
on
June 23, 2008
Inconsistent view of Roberts
Two claims, in one paragraph, are inconsistent: Justice Alito was never seriously believed to be more conservative or even more overtly conservative than John Robertsand John Roberts [was] still widely, if wrongly, billed at that time as a temperate bridge-builder
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
srdiamond
on
February 8, 2008
The First Amendment
While an independent judiciary is a nice convenience, it is not the sole or even the necessary protection of the First Amendment. The real protection for the First Amendment is the people, as voters and as citizens and if necessary as activists. If we elect representatives and presidents who respect our liberties, we will not need an independent ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
Breadbaker
on
September 20, 2007
So what's the solution?
Wow, degsme. Thanks for the great posts. So, what's the plan? How do we solve this? (I hope I wasn't the one who name called, for goodness sake, we haven't stooped that low, have we?) On many of these issues we are just in disagreement. I will always think my grandparents worked in a diverse environment in Eastern Washington because as a city ...
Posted to
The Breakfast Table
by
Kristine
on
July 15, 2007
The Seattle Problem
I think Mr.Dellinger doesn't understand the issue in Seattle when he chides Chief Justice Roberts for comparing historic racism in the South to the SSD's policies. Of course, they are radically different. And no white person in Seattle would ever say that their experiences over the past 3-4 decades could ever equate to those of an African American ...
Posted to
The Breakfast Table
by
Kristine
on
July 1, 2007
Thank you for the discussion
I'd especially like to thank Walter for his exceptionally moving reflections before and after the schools case came down on the real life meanings of segregation and racial difference in this society--truly America's original sin passed down from generation to generation (and thanks for the Charlie Black quote!). I'm not generally such a great ...
Posted to
The Breakfast Table
by
The Wise Bard
on
June 29, 2007
Academics and realists
I wouldn't call the Roberts-Alito-Scalia-Thomas axis of the Supreme Court ''mean,'' although that's a fair description of the result when they apply their theories to the Constitution. The term I'd probably use is ''academic.'' I know, that word usually is reserved for pointy-head liberal intellectuals, but it's really an apt description of how ...
Posted to
The Breakfast Table
by
randy-khan
on
June 27, 2007