enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
The Fray Browse by Tags
Sign in
  
Advanced
All Tags » Hitchens » Neocons

  • Hitchens' Imperious Drunken Rants: Iran and Islam

    Reading a communist thug become an imperious Neo Con is like watching a turd dry out in the Florida sun during rainy season. Every afternoon, any drying that's happened during the humid morning is reversed again by afternoon showers. So dry, wet, dry wet, leaves layers and patches of dryness and wetness. Hitchens' main rhetorical attack- void ...
    Posted to Fighting Words by Usama3 on June 15, 2009

  • Does Iran Counter-balancing Israel bring Stability?

    I suppose being an Israeli nowadays is quite bleak. Warmongers dominate all politics in Israel, apparently, and normal relations with allies who are distant neighbors can be destructive for them - Georgia being such an example. I suppose it seems like increasing Israeli military actions throughout the region is the only solution to protecting ...
    Posted to Fighting Words by Usama3 on February 19, 2009

  • Vintage Hitchens destroys Gov Palin's remains

    Mr Hitchens warns us of his ire with the 2 year campaign in his 1st sentence which goes far from being soured gastric juices. A manufacturing chemist who works daily with the most toxic compounds will identiy the composition of Mr Hitchins's 1st sentence for us shortly. I wish to be enlightened. Sarah Palin's remains, political & earthly, ...
    Posted to Fighting Words by larry278 on October 28, 2008

  • The Great Game -- Anglo Amero Brits and Kamchatka!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waziristan Honestly, I do not know why it is, that I both love to read Christopher Hitchens every week, and disagree with his every point almost without exception. Maybe it is his ''the sun never sets on the British Empire'' world girdling perapatetic meanderings around the World Map of Current Events and political ...
    Posted to Fighting Words by MichaelBernard2 on September 19, 2008

  • Re: An Amazingly Lazy Essay

    Mr. Hitchens has his own talking points (whether he is aware of them or not) and doesn't require any guidance from either party to work his mischief. In this case his points are: 1)Saddam killed Kurds 2)Neocons killed Saddam 3)McCain is more neoconservative than Obama, ergo: 4)McCain deserves a gentleman's defense. In the end two things are ...
    Posted to Fighting Words by tomrigid on September 1, 2008