The Fray
Campaign 2008
News & Politics
Arts & Life
Business & Tech
Health & Science
Style & Shopping
Travel & Food
Sports
Slate
on NPR
NEWSLETTERS
PODCASTS
RSS
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
Global warming
2008 elections
African American
Al Gore
apathy
borders
business
carbon
children
Christianity
climate
climate change
climatologists
climatology
coffee
Conceited
conservation
Conservatives
consumerism
consumption
corn
corporate greed
corporations
corporatism
correlation
cotton
credibility
Daniel Engber is a crazy
ddt
deceit
dissent
dot earth
Economics
economy
Ecosystem
energy
Environment
environmentalism
evolution
executive pay
expediency
fat
Foreign Legion
future
Garbage
gifts
global warming climate change naysayers science integrity
green
greenhouse
greenhouse effect
greenhouse gases
healthcare
Illegals
Immigration
Liberals
light bulbs
medicaid
mercury
methane
Mexico
nuclear power
obese
obesity
oil
overpopulation
Over-weight Wall-e
parenting
pixar
politics
pollution
Population Control
poverty
Progressives
religion
revenue
revkin
rhetoric
rosenbaum
Science
Scientific truth
selfishness
skeptics
society
solar power
sun
superdelegates
Tangled Web
taxes
texas
trade
transportation
Truth
United States
veganism
veterans
wall e
Wall-E
war
water
wind
wool
Rising Smugness Swamps all Reason
Clearly - according to Fraywatch - all is well in the Eco-Temple. Hate to break-up the prayer circle, but - for the record - there is no scientific consensus on the catastrophic effects of climate change, and - actually - there can be no purely scientific consensus, because the effects will be in the space where the natural world, the economic ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
Marcus61
on
August 15, 2008
Re: A Response from Andrew Revkin
Beautifully stated! The science issues are: i) whether or not we have anthropogenic CO2 mediated global warming (settled in the affirmative); ii) what the magnitude and varied impacts of this warming will be (not settled). The complementary policy issue is what - if anything - should be done about this. As a layman, I'd be happy to restrict my ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
Marcus61
on
August 11, 2008
Climate science and dissent
I had other plans for this morning, but the article by Rosenbaum and the subsequent discussion are too interesting to ignore (thanks, Matt, for the link). As a climate scientist (30 years of active research in government laboratories and academia and more than 200 peer-reviewed publications), professor, and lecturer on global climate, the ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
Climate.guy
on
August 11, 2008
Global warming consensus: bait and switch
Whether or not we experiencing anthropogenic climate change is not the interesting or difficult issue; rather, what could or should be done to adapt to, or prevent global change - of all sorts, not just climate mediated change - is where we should have information, and debate. But the consensus-mongers among us are trying to push the view that ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
Marcus61
on
August 10, 2008
Comments on article and discussion
Interesting discussion. I work in the field of computer modeling of nonlinear physical phenomena, although not in the particular field of climate modeling (my PhD is in physics). Every month or so I do a quick review of some of the literature concerning the climate debate. Thank you, Ron, for a nice article on the subject of reporting ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
colorless.blue.ideas
on
August 9, 2008
When is skepticism wrong?
As is often the case, the question is where to draw the line. Is the earth round, or is it flat after all? Does the earth orbit the sun, or is it immobile after all? Do species evolve through mechanisms such as natural selection and genetic drift, or were they all created through the direct agency of a supernatural person? Is ''space-time'' ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
FourCorners
on
August 9, 2008
"Find the Argument"
I wish Ron Rosenbaum had explored my <a href=''http://www.nytimes.com/dotearth''>Dot Earth</a> posts and Times articles on how best to<a href=''http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/climate-research-media-focus-whiplash/''> cover climate science</a> as well as my blogroll. Then he might have realized that Nick ...
Posted to
The Spectator
by
Andy Revkin
on
August 9, 2008
Business Innovation
I think that one of the greatest steps toward improving our environment is increasing the individuals sense of responsibility toward it. One of the best ways we can do this is by supporting innovative businesses that not only provide us with our desired utility but also benefit the environment. For example, I came across a website ...
Posted to
Green Room
by
Gustavion
on
July 23, 2008
Regarding the Wall-E article...
''Wall-E tells us that if we don't change the way we live, we'll all get really fat and destroy the world.'' You'll find no bigger supporter of the first amendment than me. However, I think the statement above, quoted from the article is a little biased. To me, it sounds like someone who is just looking for a reason to look down on ...
Posted to
Green Room
by
CWickham
on
July 11, 2008
Fat enough
I couldn't even finish this article. I am sure that some people can't help being fat. All your science aside I have known many people that went from an active lifestyle to an inactive one and gained a lot of weight. Period. If you don't care enough about your own body to eat right, exercise, and generally take care of the one and only thing in ...
Posted to
Green Room
by
digitalmonkeys
on
July 11, 2008
1
2
3
4
5
Next >
...
Last ยป