Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
Fighting Words
»
diplomacy
Afghanistan
al Qaeda
Alexander the Great
American Empire
Banging the war drums
Benazir Bhutto
Bill Clinton
Britain
British
burma
Bush
christopher hitchens
CIA
colonialism
communism
constitution
Constitutionalism
Culture
curmedgeon
Dick Cheney
empire
England
enlightenment
Enough
Europe
Feith
fundamentalism
generals
George W. Bush
God
GOP
guns
history
Hitchens
Hitchens Pakistan CIA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waziristan
Imperialism
India
India Pakistan
insurgency
intelligence
invasion
iraq
Iraq War
Islam
islam war
Islamabad
islamists
Islamofascism
Islamophobia
Issues
It Takes All Kinds of Faith
kashmir india
Marines
MCCain
Middle East
military
monotheism
morality
Muslims
Nation
nation building
national interests
NATO USA TERRORISM PAKISTAN
Neocons
New York Post
Osama bin Laden
Pakistan
palestine
peace
peacekeeping
Pentagon
Petraeus
policies
politics
Queen
Qur'an
religious right
Republican
send Hitchens
soldiers
statecraft
Statism
Surge
terrorism
terrorists
theocracy
Turkey
USA Pakistan Iran terrorism
victory
war
War on Terror
withdrawal
Wolfowitz
World
World War
The Great Game -- Anglo Amero Brits and Kamchatka!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waziristan Honestly, I do not know why it is, that I both love to read Christopher Hitchens every week, and disagree with his every point almost without exception. Maybe it is his ''the sun never sets on the British Empire'' world girdling perapatetic meanderings around the World Map of Current Events and political ...
Posted to
Fighting Words
by
MichaelBernard2
on
September 19, 2008
unpardonable skepticism
Hitchens seems to be exercising a strange prerogative here. His skepticism is, but of course, based in cool intellectual rigor. Yet, out of nowhere, he concludes his essay by announcing that any such skepticism being voiced by ''liberals and Democrats'' should be regarded as suspect to the point of being unpardonable. (Presumably the crime needing ...
Posted to
Fighting Words
by
Tom Driscoll
on
November 20, 2007
Re: Hitchens is correct for the first time since 1997
LT-7: No. I just don't like to have them use things just to try and divert attention. There aren't all that many things that we are going to actually do anything about while we are stuck in Iraq. Our military is highly unlikely to end up invading Myanmar and creating a regime change. It is too busy stuck in the middle of a civil war in ...
Posted to
Fighting Words
by
roctheboat
on
October 2, 2007