Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
Feminism
»
abortion
2008 Elections
2008 presidential election
abolition abortion
abortion rights fetus love hope compasion murder
abortion parental approval
abortiortion debate
abortiotion
abstinece
ACLU
activism
adoption
advocate
America
anti-choice
baby
Barack Obama
big brother
birth control
breastfeeding
Catholic Church
choice
church and state
Civil Rights
Congress
conservatism
conservative
Constitution
courts
democracy
Democrats
elections
emancipation
embryonic
embryos
Equal Parenting
equality
ethics
exams
extremist
facts
female
Feminism/Humanism Same Difference
feminist
fertility
fetus
forced pregnancy
forensic science
free speech
Freedom
fundamentalism
future
gender
government
human being
justice
Law
legislature
libertarians
life
mccain
mental health
moral
Moral Argument
morality
morality of abortion
murder
orphans
overpopulation
Palin
parenting
Politics
politics of reproductive rights
pregnancy
president
pro-choice
pro-life
prosecution
punishment
religion
reproductive health
reproductive justice
reproductive rights
Republican
right to choose
Right to life
rights
right-wing
roe vs wade
rule of law
Sarah Palin
Scalia
Senate
sex education
sexism
South Dakota Abortion Law
Supreme Court
teen pregnancy
Woman
womb
women
A False Dichotomy
Pitting women’s rights against cultural freedom implies that a woman’s equality, dignity, and health are somehow foreign concepts outside the West. But the African Union human rights treaty only recognized abortion rights because of activism by African women’s groups (Solidarity for African Women’s Rights), who recognized that illegal and unsafe ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
Isobel541
on
January 29, 2009
Re: something that is never mentioned
I had no doubt that some of you would dismiss the first source. That's why I arbitrarily picked it - Chapter One, Footnote One. However, this claim may ALSO be verified through Gallop. But more importantly, there are multiple sources - some I'm sure you wouldn't dismiss. Unless of course, you've already to decided to dismiss information from ...
Posted to
XX Factor Extra
by
Chauffeurkp
on
November 26, 2008
Re: something that is never mentioned
Well you need to read some more then. Your emotions cloud your reasoning. If in fact you have an education, then you know (particularly as an ethicist) that uncontrolled outbursts are a sure sign of a hidden problem. I'm guessing involvement in an abortion. But maybe not. But surely, if that's the case, you'd have to agree that your ability ...
Posted to
XX Factor Extra
by
Chauffeurkp
on
November 25, 2008
Re: So sick of this.
Correction.... one point six million murders per year. Almost fifty million since Roe v. Wade. That's roughly 17% of our population. That's 1/6 of our population - young people who would be starting their own families now, paying taxes, buying houses and contributing to society that are missing. Yep, no issue is bigger than slaughtering 1.6 ...
Posted to
XX Factor Extra
by
Chauffeurkp
on
November 25, 2008
Re: something that is never mentioned
HA! You've fallen for the hype that ''It's just a blob of tissue.'' of ''A bunch of cells.'' But let's just assume (for a moment) that this is true (as you think) during the first trimester. Are you then in agreement that abortion is wrong in subsequent trimesters? Here's a link about fetal development ...
Posted to
XX Factor Extra
by
Chauffeurkp
on
November 25, 2008
Re: something that is never mentioned
Check your facts folks. PP does NOT encourage or promote adoption. IF they did ''Planned'' ''Parenthood'' would be a natural segway toward adoption and offer the services themselves. But they're not really planning parenthood for anybody. Interestingly enough, the Crisis Pregnancy Centers who DO promote adoption are on PP's target list. ...
Posted to
XX Factor Extra
by
Chauffeurkp
on
November 25, 2008
Re: Too Silly for Words
Amazing how silly our government can be..... Here's an excerpt from Wikipedia about the Dred Scott Decision... Dred Scott v. Sandford,[1] 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court that ruled that people of African descent imported into the United States and held as slaves, or their descendants[2]—whether or ...
Posted to
XX Factor Extra
by
Chauffeurkp
on
November 25, 2008
Re: something that is never mentioned
Sorry, your ten cents, isn't worth a nickel. Honest Pro-life folks see that women who are faced with a crisis pregnancy need the greatest compassion of all. Pro-Choice folks don't realize that she's not offered any choice at all except killing her child. Planned Parenthood doesn't offer (or want to offer) information about adoption options, ...
Posted to
XX Factor Extra
by
Chauffeurkp
on
November 25, 2008
Palin Teenage Pregancy.
What no one is considering here is the possibility that this young girl could have been coerced/pressured by her boyfriend into having unprotected sex. She also could have been raped/incested. And given her mother's zero tolerance stance on abortion, that would mean that the possibility exists that this young girl is being forced by her mother to ...
Posted to
Human Nature
by
michele.lafferty
on
October 15, 2008
Why John McCain should put Sarah Palin on the Supreme Court.
While you are at the moral high horse it is a good idea to have look at the following subjects. The party has moved from taking the female vote for granted to outright contempt for women. That’s why Palin represents the most serious conservative threat ever to the modern liberal claim on issues of cultural and social superiority. Why? Because men ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
Zac
on
September 13, 2008
1
2
3
Next >