enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
The Fray Browse by Tags
Sign in
  
Advanced
All Tags » Feminism » Catholic Church

  • Re: something that is never mentioned

    Well you need to read some more then. Your emotions cloud your reasoning. If in fact you have an education, then you know (particularly as an ethicist) that uncontrolled outbursts are a sure sign of a hidden problem. I'm guessing involvement in an abortion. But maybe not. But surely, if that's the case, you'd have to agree that your ability ...
    Posted to XX Factor Extra by Chauffeurkp on November 25, 2008

  • Re: something that is never mentioned

    HA! You've fallen for the hype that ''It's just a blob of tissue.'' of ''A bunch of cells.'' But let's just assume (for a moment) that this is true (as you think) during the first trimester. Are you then in agreement that abortion is wrong in subsequent trimesters? Here's a link about fetal development ...
    Posted to XX Factor Extra by Chauffeurkp on November 25, 2008

  • Re: something that is never mentioned

    Check your facts folks. PP does NOT encourage or promote adoption. IF they did ''Planned'' ''Parenthood'' would be a natural segway toward adoption and offer the services themselves. But they're not really planning parenthood for anybody. Interestingly enough, the Crisis Pregnancy Centers who DO promote adoption are on PP's target list. ...
    Posted to XX Factor Extra by Chauffeurkp on November 25, 2008

  • Re: something that is never mentioned

    Check your facts folks. PP does NOT encourage or promote adoption. IF they did ''Planned'' ''Parenthood'' would be a natural segway toward adoption and offer the services themselves. But they're not really planning parenthood for anybody. Interestingly enough, the Crisis Pregnancy Centers who DO promote adoption are on PP's target list. PP ...
    Posted to XX Factor Extra by Chauffeurkp on November 25, 2008

  • Re: Too Silly for Words

    Amazing how silly our government can be..... Here's an excerpt from Wikipedia about the Dred Scott Decision... Dred Scott v. Sandford,[1] 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court that ruled that people of African descent imported into the United States and held as slaves, or their descendants[2]—whether or ...
    Posted to XX Factor Extra by Chauffeurkp on November 25, 2008