Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
Constitution
»
judiciary
2008 Elections
2nd amendment
abortion
accommodation
ACLU
activism
advocate
affirmative action
African American
Alberto Gonzalez
America
American election
attorney general
authoritarianism
Barack Obama
big brother
California
censorship
children
Civil Rights
common sense
Congress
conviction
corruption
courts
Criminal justice
crooked goevernment officals
CSPAN
debate
democracy
Democracy socialism obama 2008
democrat
DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Democrats
discrimination
dissent
due process
Education
elections
equality
ethics
exams
executive order
Executive privilege
extremist
facts
Family Law
fantetti-fathers-rights-ohio-council-dahlia
fascism
fathers' rights
feminism
FISA
forensic science
fraud
Fray
free speech
Freedom
fundamentalism
gay marriage
gerrymandering
government
governor
hillary clinton
History
holocaust
John Roberts
Journalism
judges
judicial activism
jurisprudence
justice
Justice department
Law
lawyers
legislature
media
military
Politics
presidency
president
Propaganda
protest
punishment
race
racism
religion
Republican
rights
rule of law
Sandra Day O'Connor
secrecy
secrets
segregation
Senate
Sexuality
society
subversion
Supreme Court
United States
voting
Failure to Admit Blagojevich Appointee to Senate Big Mistake
Failure to Admit Illinois Governor Blagojevich's Appointee, the eminently qualified and well reputed Roland Burris, to the United States Senate will prove to be a supremely Big Mistake made by the Democratic Senate Leadership and yes, Barack Obama. News today is that the U.S. Senate will seat 59 Democratic Senators, including their Candidate ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
MichaelBernard3
on
January 5, 2009
Dahlia Lithwick Uses Recipes to Write a Legal Column About..
... ABORTION. Lithwick's very idea that women do not have reproductive choice, if they cannot extinquish the life growing in their own wombs, is in and of itself faulty. I mean, my God, did the female have sex with the guy, or did she not? As to being ''for change'' in everything but pro-Abort American policies at home and abroad, not everyone ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
MichaelBernard2
on
August 21, 2008
Guns don't kill people...
The phrase ''Gun's don't kill people, People kill people.'' is often used by those who believe that the 2nd amendment should allow them unlimited access to any and every firearm they can afford. They use this argument to make the point that a weapon is a tool, and since we don't restrict the use or sale of shovels, or hammers, or knives etc., ...
Posted to
The Breakfast Table
by
AJIntrocaso
on
June 26, 2008
Swinging with Passion Makes for Bad Case Law
Justice Anthony Kennedy is a passionate man. He was a passionate judge and now je is a passionate Justice. But while one may want zealousness in one’s representation in the legal arena, passion in deciding law is dangerous, if not outright foolishness. Passions are swayed. Passions are fired up. Passions are capricious. On April 18, 2007, Ms. ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
IMKessel
on
June 20, 2008
For those opposing gay marriage...
Some important points for those of you who oppose gay marriage: 1) This is not about religion. California's decision to permit gay marriages does not mean gay people are getting married in your church. Your church has every right to continue to prohibit gays from getting married. This is about the government granting gay couples rights such as ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
voxpop78
on
June 18, 2008
Why I'm an American in Exile...
On June 13th, 2007, I received a death threat from someone claiming to be a member of the US Intelligence community. What was my ''crime''? I blew the whistle on the election fraud of 2004. Why did the CIA feel threatened by this? Because I revealed how they smuggled cocaine into the US using a front company called ''Skyway Communications''. ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
amerigobard
on
November 24, 2007
Original Meaning
Though it sounds tricky, it's not so difficult to rely on the original meaning of the words used in a legal document. Here's how. A foundation of statutory construction is that the law means what the words in it say, and that the words used (unless defined in the law itself) have the same meaning as they did in common usage ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
rjhuntington
on
August 2, 2007
Limits of Judiciary Power
For my next trick, I will defend free speech without referring to the First Amendment. The English language has over ten thousand words. It has so many words, because the connotative defitions of closely related words lead to unique meanings for each one. Our language is a collection of precision tools, and in courtrooms, it is wielded ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
Niali
on
July 19, 2007
So what's the solution?
Wow, degsme. Thanks for the great posts. So, what's the plan? How do we solve this? (I hope I wasn't the one who name called, for goodness sake, we haven't stooped that low, have we?) On many of these issues we are just in disagreement. I will always think my grandparents worked in a diverse environment in Eastern Washington because as a city ...
Posted to
The Breakfast Table
by
Kristine
on
July 15, 2007
It wasn't brainwashing
I was hoping that degsme would reply to my earlier post because he obviously had insight in to the Seattle system. I disagree with Iwasblind because a lot of what you are saying is theory and makes for great t-shirt slogans. In reality a lot of these ideas don't pan out. Everyone grows up in a ''culture'' whether it is European, African, Asian, ...
Posted to
The Breakfast Table
by
Kristine
on
July 14, 2007
1
2
Next >