Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
Constitution
»
guns
$700 billion bailout
2008 Campaign
2008 elections
2nd amendment
Afghanistan
aggression
al Qaeda
Alexander the Great
alternate energy
America
American Empire
Bailout
Banging the war drums
Barack Obama
Benazir Bhutto
biden
Bill Clinton
Bill Maher
Bill O'Reilly
Bill Richardson
bipartisanship
bloggers
blue states
Bob Barr
boredom
Britain
British
Bush
bush administration
Bush family
civil liberties
conservatives
Constitutionalism
criticism
critics
Culture
curmedgeon
deathwatch
debate
Defence
delegates
Democrats
Dick Cheney
diplomacy
Disgrace
Dr. Phil
economic fairness
economic meltdown
economy
education
election 08
election coverage
elections
electoral college
Eliot Spitzer
Elton John
empire
energy
England
english
enlightenment
Enough
entertainment
ethics
Europe
Evan Bayh
executive pay
facebook
fannie mae
Feith
Fighting Words
firearms
foreign oil
Fred Thompson
freedom
fundamentalism
gender
generals
George W. Bush
global warming
God
GOP
gun control
health
healthcare
history
Hitchens
Hitchens Pakistan CIA
Homeland security
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waziristan
human rights
Imperialism
McCain
peace
Petraeus
politics
supreme court
veterans
Victory
war
I am a first time gun owner
I bought my first gun the day before the election. I joined the NRA on election night based on the outcome. I no longer feel safe in America.
Posted to
Press Box
by
DocScott
on
November 14, 2008
The Big Bailout...Ha!
There is no need for a bailout of the bank when we can bail them out through tax payer spending...heres how: America has fought hard to become an independent nation and a leader in innovation, so how can we fix our current economic downtrend efficiently? Some seem to think that throwing money at the corporations who failed us is the answer…we all ...
Posted to
Trailhead
by
Mejamz
on
September 29, 2008
The Great Game -- Anglo Amero Brits and Kamchatka!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waziristan Honestly, I do not know why it is, that I both love to read Christopher Hitchens every week, and disagree with his every point almost without exception. Maybe it is his ''the sun never sets on the British Empire'' world girdling perapatetic meanderings around the World Map of Current Events and political ...
Posted to
Fighting Words
by
MichaelBernard2
on
September 19, 2008
Guns don't kill people...
The phrase ''Gun's don't kill people, People kill people.'' is often used by those who believe that the 2nd amendment should allow them unlimited access to any and every firearm they can afford. They use this argument to make the point that a weapon is a tool, and since we don't restrict the use or sale of shovels, or hammers, or knives etc., ...
Posted to
The Breakfast Table
by
AJIntrocaso
on
June 26, 2008
Re: A Pragmatic Test
TheRanger: It is difficult to draw comparisons between the weapons of the 18th century with today. However, if you draw the analogy between soldiers at that time and currently then some logical deductions can be made. 1. The weaponry of the individual soldier is universally protected as a right. Musket and bayonet were considered protected. ...
Posted to
Recycled
by
gzuckier
on
November 26, 2007
Re: "Well regulated" militia
Sakura: There is absolutely no way any rational person could read the 2nd the way the anti-gun crowd wants is read. Not only is their reading contradictory to the rest of the Constitution itself, but every last word written by the founders concerning the matter. They may as well be claiming the earth is flat and was created 6000 years ...
Posted to
Recycled
by
gzuckier
on
November 26, 2007
Re: A Right for the Worst of Us
Faustling: Contrary to the impression created by the NRA, those convicted under our present gun laws are mainly very unsavory people: gang members, drug dealers, robbers, would-be terrorists, and people who make a living supplying them with guns. If the Supreme Court recognizes an individual right to bear arms (in 200 years, it never has), all ...
Posted to
Recycled
by
gzuckier
on
November 26, 2007
Re: Gun control, and Liberals shouldn't mix.
patron002:Ok, liberals complain about Bush taking away their rights, and not being able to do anything about it. Well imagine going a little further, where the government is taking away enough rights that you actually want to do something about it besides complain, oh wait, thats right you can't you don't believe you should be able to own a ...
Posted to
Recycled
by
gzuckier
on
November 26, 2007
Re: interpreting the second amendment is easy and simple
strongpoint: glenn harlan reynolds' excellent law-review article ''a critical guide to the second amendment'' [62 tenn. l. rev. 461-511 (1995)] is, IMHO, the best scholarly critique you'll find on the subject of second-amendment interpretation. ''The Standard Model is rooted in two main sources: the text of the Second Amendment and its ...
Posted to
Recycled
by
gzuckier
on
November 26, 2007
Re: The ulterior motives of the anti's
USNVETERAN: Why do opinion surveys show that most American citizens believe in the individual rights position? Some legal scholars call this widespread public conviction a ''hoax'' and ''false consciousness.'' It is these types who seek to undermine the RIGHT of every American to own a gun. I am an AMERICAN businessman, homeowner and ...
Posted to
Recycled
by
gzuckier
on
November 26, 2007
1
2
Next >