Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
Constitution
»
courts
2008 Elections
abortion
activism
advocate
America
attorney general
authoritarianism
Bad Apples
Barack Obama
big brother
Blagojevich
blogs
blue laws
Blue States
breastfeeding
Bush
Bush Administration
California
church and state
Civil Rights
Clarence thomas
competence
Congress
conservatism
conviction
corruption
crime
democracy
Democrats
discrimination
dissent
DNC
due process
Education
election
elections
Equal Parenting
equal protection
equality
ethics
exams
executive order
Executive privilege
extremist
facts
Family Law
fantetti-fathers-rights-ohio-council-dahlia
fascism
fathers' rights
feminism
FISA
forensic science
Fray
free speech
Freedom
fundamentalism
gay marriage
government
governor
GW BUSH
History
ideology
John Roberts
Journalism
judges
judiciary
justice
Law
lawyers
legislature
Let's not twist the Constitution
libertarians
media
multiculturalism
Politics
presidency
president
procedure
prosecution
protest
punishment
race
racism
reason
religion
Republican
responsibility
rights
Roberts
rule of law
Scalia
secrecy
secrets
Senate
Slate
society
South Dakota Abortion Law
subversion
Supreme Court
United States
Failure to Admit Blagojevich Appointee to Senate Big Mistake
Failure to Admit Illinois Governor Blagojevich's Appointee, the eminently qualified and well reputed Roland Burris, to the United States Senate will prove to be a supremely Big Mistake made by the Democratic Senate Leadership and yes, Barack Obama. News today is that the U.S. Senate will seat 59 Democratic Senators, including their Candidate ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
MichaelBernard3
on
January 5, 2009
Dahlia Lithwick Uses Recipes to Write a Legal Column About..
... ABORTION. Lithwick's very idea that women do not have reproductive choice, if they cannot extinquish the life growing in their own wombs, is in and of itself faulty. I mean, my God, did the female have sex with the guy, or did she not? As to being ''for change'' in everything but pro-Abort American policies at home and abroad, not everyone ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
MichaelBernard2
on
August 21, 2008
Great Review of Some Important Books . . .
. . . BOOKS which I think all Americans need to read and consider: Making Government Work, by Fritz Hollings Torture Team: Rumsfeld's Memo and the Betrayal of American Values, by Phillipe Sands The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned Into a War on American Ideals (Hardcover), by Jane Mayer. Terrorism and Democracy ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
MichaelBernard1
on
July 28, 2008
Error about Supreme Court Building Motto
The actual phrase etched on the facade of the U.S. Supreme Court building is ''Equal Justice Under Law,'' not ''Equal Justice for All,'' as written by the authors. While this is a minor point in the context of the entire article, these two phrases are not synonymous, in my view. The actual etched phrase necessarily is more circumscribed a ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
bwilsonfan
on
July 10, 2008
Government abuse of power
South Dakotas law relating to doctor patient communication and abortion: This is just another method for people using and abusing government power. They attempt to control others and legislate morality by forcing their beliefs (usually based on their religion) upon all of society. Their goal is to limit freedom and force conformity with their ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
den99md
on
July 4, 2008
Not quite correct
It seems that ''Telling Doctors What to Think'' is somewhat misleading about exactly what the 8th circuit did. From my reading of the ruling the 8th circuit vacated a preliminary injunction against the law, but that Planned Parenthood's case against the law will continue in the lower court. This means that while the law will go into effect, ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
zosima
on
July 3, 2008
Is recognizing equal protection a "revolution"
The branches of the government are meant to do different things. The legislative is supposed to consider policy at length, to call in the experts and interested parties and finally to enact national policy. The executive is supposed to execute the policies enacted by the legislature. And the judicial has the one-by-one job of dealing with ...
Posted to
Jurisprudence
by
Issywise
on
June 20, 2008