Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
CLINTON
»
Character
2008
2008 Campaign
2008 Campaign (McCain and the Media
2008 election
2008 Elections
2008 primaries
ABC
ABC News
Agenda
Al Franken
al Franken senate
An Independent's take on Al
antitrust
baby boomer
Barack Obama
Barack Obama trip
BarackOPhony ...
benefactor
Bill Clinton
Bill O'Reilly
blogs linking obama
Bush
Bush Administration
Bush legacy
campaign '08
campaign ads
campaign finance
campaign hypocrisy
campaign surrogates
campaigning
candyman
Carter
Center
Change
chelsea clinton
Civil Liberties
civil rights
class
clinton hillary democrats obama unity
Clintons
cnn
Comedians as Senators?
communication
Conservative Election Republican Negative Attack Smear Hate
conservatives
corruption
creator
delegates
Democracy
Democratic Bigotry
Democratic Party
Democratic Primary
Democrats
Dick Cheney
director
dishonesty
diversity
earth
electability
Election
elections
enterprise
Experience
feminism
feminists
future
gender
Hillary Bashing
Hillary Clinton
John McCain
journalism
Miss Carolina
Norm Coleman
Obama
Obama 2008
Obama Palin Biden McCain GOP
Obama vs Palin on Experience
Obama will lose
offshore
Ohio
oil
Palin
palin judgment
Palin the Unqualified
Palinalin is a nut
Playboy
Political analysis
Politics
Presidential
read
results
Senate
Success
Texas
The
vote
War
wealth
William F Buckley
world
The Audacity of Accomplishment!
Among the many political advantages that Sarah Palin’s candidacy brings to the table is that her mere presence will inevitably invite all too predictable and insulting Barrack-attacks from Democrats, such as the patronizing and politically self-destructive comment made today by none other than Barrack Obama on “60 Minutes.” Obama condescendingly ...
Posted to
Readme
by
audacity of accompishment
on
August 31, 2008
Is The Media Bias? Here is Evidence of Bias
How the Media Vote. Surveys of journalists’ self-reported voting habits show them backing the Democratic candidate in every presidential election since 1964, including landslide losers George McGovern, Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis. In 2004, a poll conducted by the University of Connecticut found journalists backed John Kerry over George W. ...
Posted to
Politics
by
MiamiVice
on
August 13, 2008
Franken on the Hill
Before we rebuild another country we need to clean our own house. By that I mean send career politicians packing, rather they be republican, democrat or an independent. Sorry this means Ted Kennedy needs to go home and fight his cancer and Oklahoma's Istook needs to return to mopping floors at the radio station. There could be worse things to ...
Posted to
Readme
by
elkc
on
July 8, 2008
America & the Media Needs the Pillars of Character
I think a wonderful way to get this race in perspective is to frame it in a completely objective set of rules! Trustworthiness Be honest • Don’t deceive, cheat or steal • Be reliable — do what you say you’ll do • Have the courage to do the right thing • Build a good reputation • Be loyal — stand by your family, friends and ...
Posted to
Politics
by
litzealot
on
April 24, 2008
Re: Chelsa Clinton
''Do you even understand the ISSUE?'' Your simplistic dismissal of the query reveals exactly what is wrong with so-called ''news'' nowadays. Whatever his intent, using ''pimped'', ''pimped-out'', or any variation in reference to ANY public figure, not just Hilary and Bill's daughter, is at least graceless and vulgar, an should be considered far ...
Posted to
XX Factor
by
commortis
on
February 9, 2008
"astute"?
''astute''? Those comments might get her a C in a junior college, but that's not the Oxford definition of the word. So Chelsea Clinton doesn't agree with all of Morgan's, I don't know, 10,000 points. ''Well, I agree with some of your points...'' is a tired college prevarication that indicates bullshit is about to be shoveled. I bet even Morgan ...
Posted to
XX Factor
by
aedelbert
on
February 6, 2008
Re: Why read more into it? Steinem is not judging your vote
Regarding Reasons Why is Hillary such a bad candidate now. Steinem was questioning the public's committment to a woman, more than anything. Because the problem of choice is one of interpreting the messages, here is how I see the different ways Obama and Clinton have been interpreted. Seems to me the package adds up to an implict willingness ...
Posted to
XX Factor
by
gayleirwin
on
January 8, 2008