Briefings
News & Politics
Arts
Life
Business & Tech
Science
Podcasts & Video
Blogs
enter the fray:
our reader discussion forum
The Fray
Browse by Tags
Sign in
Advanced
All Tags
»
Barack Obama
»
John Edwards
$700 billion bailout
2008
2008 Campaign
2008 elections
adultery
Al Gore
alternate energy
America
anthem
Appalachia
Bailout
bias
Bill Clinton
Bill Maher
Bill O'Reilly
Bill Richardson
bipartisanship
bloggers
blue states
Bob Barr
boredom
Bush
Bush Administration
Bush family
California
campaign finance
campaigning
Change
Chelsea Clinton
choice
Chris Dodd
civil liberties
Clinton
clintons
colin powell
college
Congress
conservatives
constitution
corruption
criticism
critics
deathwatch
debate
debates
delegates
Democratic Primary
Democrats
depression
Dick Cheney
Disgrace
Dr. Phil
economic fairness
economic meltdown
economy
education
electability
election 08
election coverage
elections
electoral college
Eliot Spitzer
Elizabeth Edwards
Elton John
energy
english
entertainment
ethics
Evan Bayh
executive pay
facebook
facts
fannie mae
finance
foreign oil
foreign policy
Fred Thompson
frustration
fundamentalism
gender
George W. Bush
Hillary Clinton
Independents
Iran
Iraq
Iraq War
John Dickerson
John McCain
Politics
polling
presidency
privacy
race
Ralph Nader
reason
reform
ron paul
Rudy Giuliani
voting
youtube
The Big Bailout...Ha!
There is no need for a bailout of the bank when we can bail them out through tax payer spending...heres how: America has fought hard to become an independent nation and a leader in innovation, so how can we fix our current economic downtrend efficiently? Some seem to think that throwing money at the corporations who failed us is the answer…we all ...
Posted to
Trailhead
by
Mejamz
on
September 29, 2008
Re: John Edwards Story
To continue to be fair, I don't really think a case has been proven against Edwards yet. If it turns out that the National Enquirer has been barking up the wrong tree, a possibility that I don't discount for a minute, by investigating the matter the MSM will be doing the man and his family a favor. Truthfully, I don't think that Obama was ever ...
Posted to
XX Factor
by
samsmom1127
on
July 24, 2008
White Cred my ass
Yet MORE sloppy analysis on ''white working people''. First off, by no means is this a unified/united demographic in anyone's minds other than the tea-leaf readers in the press. Secondly, Obama's had no problem at all garnering overwhelming support from ''white working people'' in states like Wisconsin, Kansas, Idaho, Colorado, etc. What is ...
Posted to
Trailhead
by
Dirk Gently
on
May 14, 2008
Less of a fantasy: President John Edwards.
Speaking of fantasies: also-ran John Edwards has just as good a chance as Bam or Hill of being the Dems' man at the August convention, and judging by current events, that's probably what he's gunning for. Want to know how? Check it out the post-North Carolina scenario on my blog.
Posted to
Chatterbox
by
room5047
on
May 5, 2008
Re: BILLary
PREDICTABLE CLINTONIAN POLITICS AND POLITRICKS vs REAL ''CHANGE'' -- Although, I'm not ready to claim Barack Obama, John Edwards or anyone as my final presidential candidate of choice, the truth of the matter is the Clinton's are getting what they have dished out for years. This time they are getting bested by someone who actually has a balanced ...
Posted to
Trailhead
by
DCIndependents
on
January 12, 2008
Re: Too Cute!
He can't say he had the idea before Darren, but a friend of mine did basically the same thing in a bit over a week and beat Darren to the punch. www.mcnarney.com These proud parents were home for the holidays in Iowa and decided baby William should have his picture taken with each of the candidates. Cute kids, both of them.
Posted to
Politics
by
phall
on
January 7, 2008
N E G L E C T E D.....C O N S T I T U E N C Y..?
For better or worse, most people vote with their pocket-book. There is a group of people in the USA who are smart, who save their money, and actually want to pay more taxes! ( No, that is NOT a typo.....we DO want to pay more taxes! ) But we can't. Not in the USA. The government won't let us. Now, who the heck am I talking about? Those ...
Posted to
Politics
by
discuss
on
November 29, 2007
It's John Edwards, Stupid!
John Dickerson wonders how Obama has successfully gone negative against Hillary Clinton without tarnishing the audacity of hope. It's simple. He's talked about taking-on Hillary without really doing so. The heavy-lifting has been left to Edwards, who has been the only one at the debates -- especially in Las Vegas -- to aggressively ...
Posted to
Politics
by
Russell1
on
November 21, 2007
Edwards Lost
The yearlykos crowd was Edward's to lose and Hillary's to lose. Edwards was passionate but in a demagogic way that talked down to the crowd. And he was the first candidate to get aggressive and attack the others (not counting Gravel) which did not play well in this crowd. Edwards, while super bright, comes across as a preening peacock who is ...
Posted to
Politics
by
ChicagoPerspective
on
August 6, 2007
Those Links Confirm That she's Bush-Cheney Lite
I don't fault Obama far calling Hillary Bush-Cheney lite. It shows that Hillary is not the only one who can withstand the Republican machine. I would've been disappointed if he had given Hillary a free pass. The author is clearly pro-Hillary, but I don't understand why he included links to stories that could damage Hillary's campaign especially ...
Posted to
Politics
by
CompassionateConservative
on
July 30, 2007
1
2
Next >