enter the fray: our reader discussion forum

The Fray

Browse by Tags

Advanced

All Tags » 2012

Calling it wrong
No wonder why many movies do not live up to expectations! The more promotions - the lower the quality of product.
Posted to Explainer by david wayne osedach on November 26, 2009
Mount Everest
I might be over analyzing it a little too much but I noticed that the doors of the ship were still open at the time that they were about to crash into the top of Mount Everest. At that elevation, the air pressure would be too low for anybody to breathe without O2 or at least several months acclimating. They say if someone were to step out of a ...
Posted to Movies by Germanicus on November 15, 2009
2012
You've convinced me. 2012 is a must see!
Posted to Movies by david wayne osedach on November 14, 2009
Re: Wrong Direction
I agree that this country is headed in the wrong direction and it will take a great deal of effort to undo what is being done. I am more convinced than ever that every person who recognizes what is happening should begin to actively campaign now against Senators and Congressmen from their state that support the current health care bill. I know I ...
Posted to Politics by catprez on August 1, 2009
There's just no cure for stupid
If you know someone who is a True Believer in the 2012 Apocalypse, the only thing you can do to help them is to remember an urgent appointment or if speaking to them on the phone, tell them an important call is coming in and you ahve to go, 'bye now. No matter how much evidence you can produce to disprove their belief, which borderes on ...
Posted to The Spectator by Cyrano on June 6, 2009
hmm
i doubt it will be the apocolipse but most religons do point to this date or era as a time of rebirth or the coming of a messiah so will all humanity die on this date i doubt it but when multiple profits thousands of years ago mentioned a time with planes suberines and xboxes as a time of destruction and nuclear warfare i think of it as more than ...
Posted to The Spectator by matthewis on June 6, 2009
article about 2012
i found this article to be rather shallow and unresearched. i understand that it may be one person's opinion, but i feel that if you are going to open yourself to others opinions, you need to have all the facts. sure the author chose to pick the media side of the 2012 issues. it makes for interesting reading i guess. but there is much more ...
Posted to The Spectator by canadanorth on June 6, 2009
2012
Finally - a counterpoint to stupidity and made-up hysteria. Thank you.
Posted to The Spectator by Lencho on June 6, 2009
Insults and snide remarks: Is this the new journalism?
I approached this article with interest, expecting a thoughtful presentation and discussion of 2012-related prophecies. Instead, I was subjected to a tirade of insults and disparaging comments about everyone who had given the matter more than a passing thought. I came out none the wiser, wondering what the point of the article was... It wasn't ...
Posted to The Spectator by Origin on June 6, 2009
2012
Too bad he just gives his opinion of why this isn't true. He uses no evidence of any kind, least of all scientific. I don't believe, or disbelieve the 2012 theory, but if you are going to try to debunk some theory, you should at the least. Have some kind of scientific proof for why it's not true. just my opinion, as this article was just this ...
Posted to The Spectator by Mr. EgO on June 6, 2009

1 2 Next >