enter the fray: our reader discussion forum

The Fray

About JIM ACKERMAN

User: JIM ACKERMAN
Recent Posts

Re: If I told you blue eyes were a marker for intelligence

Posted to Human Nature by JIM ACKERMAN on May 23, 2009 Views: 139 Replies: 0

Topic: If I told you blue eyes were a marker for intelligence
Last response by mark14 on June 24, 2009
Re: An anatomy of IQ racism

Posted to Human Nature by JIM ACKERMAN on May 12, 2009 Views: 104 Replies: 0

Topic: An anatomy of IQ racism Rating: +1
Last response by Isonomist on June 3, 2009
Re: An anatomy of IQ racism

Posted to Human Nature by JIM ACKERMAN on May 12, 2009 Views: 112 Replies: 1

Topic: An anatomy of IQ racism Rating: +1
Last response by Isonomist on June 3, 2009
Re: An anatomy of IQ racism

Posted to Human Nature by JIM ACKERMAN on May 13, 2009 Views: 107 Replies: 3

Topic: An anatomy of IQ racism Rating: +1
Last response by Isonomist on June 3, 2009
Let Cheney have his head,...

Posted to War Stories by JIM ACKERMAN on May 26, 2009 Views: 167 Replies: 0

Topic: Let Cheney have his head,...
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on May 26, 2009
Why was Jesus convicted?

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on April 15, 2009 Views: 613 Replies: 4

Topic: Why was Jesus convicted?
Last response by Sovereign9 on May 3, 2009
Re: Your biggest error

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on April 16, 2009 Views: 109 Replies: 1

Topic: Why was Jesus convicted?
Last response by Sovereign9 on May 3, 2009
Re: Failure of technical analysis.

Posted to Moneybox by JIM ACKERMAN on April 30, 2009 Views: 139 Replies: 0

Topic: Failure of technical analysis.
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on April 30, 2009
Re: Shoo troll

Posted to Jurisprudence by JIM ACKERMAN on April 13, 2009 Views: 109 Replies: 1

Topic: Once the genie is out of the bottle it never goes back! Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on April 14, 2009
Re: Que?

Posted to Jurisprudence by JIM ACKERMAN on April 13, 2009 Views: 100 Replies: 0

Topic: Once the genie is out of the bottle it never goes back! Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on April 14, 2009
Re: Once the genie is out of the bottle it never goes back!

Posted to Jurisprudence by JIM ACKERMAN on April 13, 2009 Views: 155 Replies: 1

Topic: Once the genie is out of the bottle it never goes back! Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on April 14, 2009
Re: Boiling intelligent design down to math.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 10, 2009 Views: 137 Replies: 1

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: Boiling intelligent design down to math.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 10, 2009 Views: 148 Replies: 0

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: Actually, the equation is MUCH simpler

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 10, 2009 Views: 175 Replies: 0

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: reductio ad saucem

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 10, 2009 Views: 192 Replies: 1

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: That has got to be...

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 10, 2009 Views: 163 Replies: 1

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: Boiling intelligent design down to math.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 10, 2009 Views: 152 Replies: 0

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
The general response.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 11, 2009 Views: 143 Replies: 2

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: reductio ad saucem

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 13, 2009 Views: 182 Replies: 2

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: Don't be shy about...

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 16, 2009 Views: 151 Replies: 0

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: Actually, I am a scientist

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 16, 2009 Views: 221 Replies: 1

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: That isn't the significant difference

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 16, 2009 Views: 173 Replies: 2

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: That isn't the significant difference

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 17, 2009 Views: 151 Replies: 0

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: More than the meal, perhaps

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 17, 2009 Views: 144 Replies: 1

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: So the universe cannot in fact exist, that's your take?

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 18, 2009 Views: 153 Replies: 1

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: That isn't the significant difference

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 18, 2009 Views: 171 Replies: 1

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: That isn't the significant difference

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 19, 2009 Views: 178 Replies: 0

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: Okay -- let's just assume that God did it.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009 Views: 182 Replies: 0

Topic: Boiling intelligent design down to math. Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 24, 2009
Re: The real French paradox.

Posted to Drink by JIM ACKERMAN on March 18, 2009 Views: 195 Replies: 0

Topic: The real French paradox.
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 18, 2009
Re: Lithwick, Innocence Project is entirely wrong

Posted to Jurisprudence by JIM ACKERMAN on March 18, 2009 Views: 111 Replies: 0

Topic: Lithwick, Innocence Project is entirely wrong Rating: +1/-5
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 18, 2009
Re: Lithwick, Innocence Project is entirely wrong

Posted to Jurisprudence by JIM ACKERMAN on March 18, 2009 Views: 139 Replies: 0

Topic: Lithwick, Innocence Project is entirely wrong Rating: +1/-5
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 18, 2009
Deflation is the background; fraud is the engine.

Posted to Dialogues by JIM ACKERMAN on March 5, 2009 Views: 329 Replies: 1

Topic: Deflation is the background; fraud is the engine.
Last response by daystar on March 5, 2009
Fareed Zakaria isn't an idiot...

Posted to War Stories by JIM ACKERMAN on March 3, 2009 Views: 290 Replies: 0

Topic: Fareed Zakaria isn't an idiot...
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on March 3, 2009
Re: The Grammar of Evolution: What does religion...

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 16, 2009 Views: 210 Replies: 1

Topic: The Grammar of Evolution: What does religion...
Last response by predicto on February 26, 2009
Re: It's a fact in exactly the same way as gravity

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 17, 2009 Views: 174 Replies: 1

Topic: The Grammar of Evolution: What does religion...
Last response by predicto on February 26, 2009
Re: Mediate, legislative, non-translational? Yes: that's baloney

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 18, 2009 Views: 168 Replies: 1

Topic: The Grammar of Evolution: What does religion...
Last response by predicto on February 26, 2009
Re: The Grammar of Evolution: What does religion...

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 18, 2009 Views: 243 Replies: 0

Topic: The Grammar of Evolution: What does religion...
Last response by predicto on February 26, 2009
Re: Mediate, legislative, non-translational? Yes: that's baloney

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 19, 2009 Views: 163 Replies: 2

Topic: The Grammar of Evolution: What does religion...
Last response by predicto on February 26, 2009
Re: Mediate, legislative, non-translational? Yes: that's baloney

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 24, 2009 Views: 157 Replies: 0

Topic: The Grammar of Evolution: What does religion...
Last response by predicto on February 26, 2009
Re: I don't see how I've done that

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 24, 2009 Views: 162 Replies: 1

Topic: The Grammar of Evolution: What does religion...
Last response by predicto on February 26, 2009
Re: "Evidence for the creator is creation"

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 25, 2009 Views: 162 Replies: 2

Topic: The Grammar of Evolution: What does religion...
Last response by predicto on February 26, 2009
Re: "Evidence for the creator is creation"

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 26, 2009 Views: 180 Replies: 0

Topic: The Grammar of Evolution: What does religion...
Last response by predicto on February 26, 2009
Re: Answering some objections.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 26, 2009 Views: 154 Replies: 1

Topic: The Grammar of Evolution: What does religion...
Last response by predicto on February 26, 2009
Re: Answering some objections.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 26, 2009 Views: 139 Replies: 1

Topic: The Grammar of Evolution: What does religion...
Last response by predicto on February 26, 2009
Re: Answering some objections.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 26, 2009 Views: 144 Replies: 0

Topic: The Grammar of Evolution: What does religion...
Last response by predicto on February 26, 2009
Re: Bullshit

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 11, 2009 Views: 146 Replies: 0

Topic: Vatican II was despised by most Catholics Rating: +1/-3
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on February 11, 2009
Re: The Way I Was

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 10, 2009 Views: 128 Replies: 1

Topic: Plato's Ideal....and America's Reality Rating: -2
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on February 11, 2009
Re: The Way I Was

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 11, 2009 Views: 130 Replies: 0

Topic: Plato's Ideal....and America's Reality Rating: -2
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on February 11, 2009
Re: Perhaps you'd best define 'creationism'

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 10, 2009 Views: 359 Replies: 0

Topic: Can Science and Religion Be Reconciled?
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on February 10, 2009
Re: "ten dollar" study hardly rational link to Atheism

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 3, 2009 Views: 140 Replies: 0

Topic: "ten dollar" study hardly rational link to Atheism
Last response by J.MADISON on February 3, 2009
Re: Well, Ackerman....

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 3, 2009 Views: 166 Replies: 0

Topic: Morality, mathematics, and religion. Rating: +1
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on February 3, 2009
Re: Morality, mathematics, and religion.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 3, 2009 Views: 143 Replies: 0

Topic: Morality, mathematics, and religion. Rating: +1
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on February 3, 2009
Re: You fail to make a distinction between historical religions

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 3, 2009 Views: 183 Replies: 0

Topic: Morality, mathematics, and religion. Rating: +1
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on February 3, 2009
Re: Are you sure you're not

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 3, 2009 Views: 138 Replies: 0

Topic: Morality, mathematics, and religion. Rating: +1
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on February 3, 2009
Re: You fail to make a distinction between historical religions

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 3, 2009 Views: 160 Replies: 1

Topic: Morality, mathematics, and religion. Rating: +1
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on February 3, 2009
Re: OK Ackerman

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on February 3, 2009 Views: 150 Replies: 0

Topic: Morality, mathematics, and religion. Rating: +1
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on February 3, 2009
Re: What does morality have to do with religion?

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on January 21, 2009 Views: 282 Replies: 0

Topic: What does morality have to do with religion? Rating: +1
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on January 21, 2009
If you're still listening...

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on January 13, 2009 Views: 273 Replies: 0

Topic: Don't leave out the Religious Aetheists
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on January 13, 2009
Re: Morality, writing, and poker.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 9, 2008 Views: 207 Replies: 1

Topic: Morality, writing, and poker.
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 21, 2008
Re: Morality, writing, and poker.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 9, 2008 Views: 185 Replies: 0

Topic: Morality, writing, and poker.
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 21, 2008
Re: Morality, writing, and poker.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 10, 2008 Views: 225 Replies: 1

Topic: Morality, writing, and poker.
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 21, 2008
Re: Morality, writing, and poker.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 11, 2008 Views: 297 Replies: 1

Topic: Morality, writing, and poker.
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 21, 2008
Re: Truth?

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 28, 2008 Views: 270 Replies: 1

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: Truth?

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 28, 2008 Views: 294 Replies: 1

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: Truth?

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 28, 2008 Views: 221 Replies: 1

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: Truth?

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 28, 2008 Views: 209 Replies: 1

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: Truth?

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 28, 2008 Views: 289 Replies: 1

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: btw...

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 29, 2008 Views: 261 Replies: 1

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: A question if I may, Mr. Ackerman:

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 2, 2008 Views: 327 Replies: 2

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: btw...

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 2, 2008 Views: 250 Replies: 2

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: A question if I may, Mr. Ackerman:

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 2, 2008 Views: 240 Replies: 2

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: Oh, those Trobrianders...

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 4, 2008 Views: 237 Replies: 1

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: Oh, those Trobrianders...

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 4, 2008 Views: 228 Replies: 2

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: Oh, those Trobrianders...

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 9, 2008 Views: 239 Replies: 0

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: Oh, those Trobrianders...

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 10, 2008 Views: 240 Replies: 1

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: Oh, those Trobrianders...

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 11, 2008 Views: 278 Replies: 0

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: Oh, those Trobrianders...

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 11, 2008 Views: 326 Replies: 1

Topic: Truth?
Last response by J. Ackerman on December 14, 2008
Re: Classic nature v nurtute.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 9, 2008 Views: 273 Replies: 1

Topic: A genetic predisposition for morality?
Last response by Havelock on December 13, 2008
Re: You are making this too hard for yourself.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 10, 2008 Views: 316 Replies: 0

Topic: A genetic predisposition for morality?
Last response by Havelock on December 13, 2008
Re: Yes, morality as such is learned.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 10, 2008 Views: 207 Replies: 0

Topic: A genetic predisposition for morality?
Last response by Havelock on December 13, 2008
Re: Yes, morality as such is learned.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 11, 2008 Views: 273 Replies: 1

Topic: A genetic predisposition for morality?
Last response by Havelock on December 13, 2008
Re: Euthyphro

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 11, 2008 Views: 234 Replies: 1

Topic: Euthyphro
Last response by CCH on December 12, 2008
Re: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 24, 2008 Views: 258 Replies: 0

Topic: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality Rating: +1/-1
Last response by predicto on December 10, 2008
Re: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 25, 2008 Views: 253 Replies: 0

Topic: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality Rating: +1/-1
Last response by predicto on December 10, 2008
Re: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 25, 2008 Views: 231 Replies: 1

Topic: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality Rating: +1/-1
Last response by predicto on December 10, 2008
Re: To say "everything is simply atoms bouncing around" is

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 25, 2008 Views: 208 Replies: 2

Topic: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality Rating: +1/-1
Last response by predicto on December 10, 2008
Re: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 25, 2008 Views: 190 Replies: 0

Topic: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality Rating: +1/-1
Last response by predicto on December 10, 2008
Re: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 25, 2008 Views: 390 Replies: 0

Topic: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality Rating: +1/-1
Last response by predicto on December 10, 2008
Re: What I would say . . .

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 25, 2008 Views: 362 Replies: 2

Topic: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality Rating: +1/-1
Last response by predicto on December 10, 2008
Re: Correction . . .

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 25, 2008 Views: 245 Replies: 1

Topic: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality Rating: +1/-1
Last response by predicto on December 10, 2008
Re: SLATE THE CESSPOOL

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 25, 2008 Views: 208 Replies: 0

Topic: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality Rating: +1/-1
Last response by predicto on December 10, 2008
Re: Looking at one of your posts above . . .

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 25, 2008 Views: 231 Replies: 1

Topic: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality Rating: +1/-1
Last response by predicto on December 10, 2008
Re: Heh, heh . . . What?

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 25, 2008 Views: 288 Replies: 0

Topic: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality Rating: +1/-1
Last response by predicto on December 10, 2008
Re: But all morality is relative to circumstance

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 25, 2008 Views: 228 Replies: 0

Topic: Atheists Have No Basis for Morality Rating: +1/-1
Last response by predicto on December 10, 2008
Re: Moral liquidity?

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 9, 2008 Views: 389 Replies: 0

Topic: The notion of fundamental fairness.
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on December 9, 2008
Re: Great post CCH!

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on December 9, 2008 Views: 212 Replies: 0

Topic: Longitudinal analysis required Rating: +1
Last response by white light on December 9, 2008
Re: Atheist, a homosexuality draft.

Posted to Faith-Based by JIM ACKERMAN on November 28, 2008 Views: 248 Replies: 0

Topic: Atheist, a homosexuality draft. Rating: +1/-6
Last response by happyatheist on December 5, 2008
Re: Did Slate just vindicate Bush's methods?

Posted to Foreigners by JIM ACKERMAN on November 29, 2008 Views: 236 Replies: 1

Topic: Did Slate just vindicate Bush's methods?
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on December 2, 2008
Re: Did Slate just vindicate Bush's methods?

Posted to Foreigners by JIM ACKERMAN on December 2, 2008 Views: 379 Replies: 0

Topic: Did Slate just vindicate Bush's methods?
Last response by JIM ACKERMAN on December 2, 2008
Re: Mr. Tribe's logic must be better than Ms. Lithwick's

Posted to Books by JIM ACKERMAN on November 18, 2008 Views: 224 Replies: 2

Topic: Mr. Tribe's logic must be better than Ms. Lithwick's Rating: -1
Last response by trapdoor on December 2, 2008

User: JIM ACKERMAN Recent Posts

User: JIM ACKERMAN
Recent Posts