Go to Ask.com


enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
The Differences Are Meager?
by Urgelt
+1 Reply

Dahlia Lithwick wrote, "To be sure, the policy differences between Obama and Clinton may be meager."

There are two policy differences that are not meager at all.

One: Sen. Clinton is very, very cautious about upsetting gung-ho pro-war advocates. Sen. Obama, on the other hand, has said from the start that war in Iraq was a lousy way to advance our national interest - even when it was unpopular and disadvantageous to say so. The two candidates are quite far apart on the use of military force as an instrument of foreign policy in general, and on the use of force in Iraq specifically.

Two: Sen. Clinton takes money from corporate interests. Lots of money. Sen. Obama does not. To anyone who gives a damn about Government corruption, to anyone who remembers how the Clinton Administration regulators carried on in the fine corrupt tradition of the Reagan and Bush I regulators, this is a big deal. Some of us, Dahlia, want to see Government serve citizens' interests first, not those of corporations. Some of us regard corruption as the most important policy question of our generation - even though mainstream media has managed to say almost nothing about it ever since a corrupt FCC appointed by President Clinton loosened media ownership rules. That move led to a corporate feeding frenzy that delivered into just a few hands control over what mainstream media would and would not say. Some worry that our democracy has been unraveling ever since because of it.

I'd say those are two important issues, and I'd say the policy differences between the two candidates are anything but meager. Some honest reporting about those differences, rather than this identity politics blather we've been hearing endlessly, would be a welcome relief.

Re: The Differences Are Meager?
by hawaiimike

Yes, but Hillary, like John Kerry was for the war before she was against it. So she's against the war, at least as long as the war polls negative. I would say Hillary and Bill Clinton will take money from almost anybody, and their extremely checkered history shows just that. If anybody thinks the Rezko issue is in fact an issue, they should be running from Hillary and not looking back. Bill Clinton has had numerous dealings with so called scum. In fact, he pardoned a bunch of these convicts before he left office.

View as RSS news feed in XML