How is it NOT a definite timetable...
by
slatepublius
03/08/2008, 1:44 AM #
when Obama has said a thousand times at virtually every campaign rally for six months that he will “remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months”?
Of course, it's a timetable -- and that is exactly what Obama has meant it to be, because it's what his voters want. This is so clear that Slate's lame attempt to make it murky reveals nothing so much as Slate's eagerness to get in the tank for Obama.
Ms. Power unambiguously let the cat out of the bag. Of course, it's not really desirable or even possible to pull all the troops out in short order -- and as President Obama no doubt would move more slowly. But THAT IS NOT WHAT THE MAN HAS SAID HE WOULD DO AND CONTINUED TO SAY YESTERDAY IN SCRAMBLING TO RECOVER FROM POWER'S BLUNDER.
In short, the man is full of beans. Not that this should be a surprise about a glib politician, but a good deal of Obama's support has come from those most adamantly anti-war who mistrust Hillary. So now, they really ought to mistrust Obama equally, but sorry to say, they've mostly drunk the Kool Aid.
The wider impact of this and the Nafta episode on voters is bound to be that Obama is not the man he pretends to be. Whether that helps Hillary much remains to be seen but it's nonsense to try to shrug this off as trivial.