Re: It's worse than just rejecting gays...
by
MsBasque
08/03/2007, 10:57 AM #
I hate to be the party pooper but Eharmony is NOT:
-A government Agency
-An agency that receives monies from the Government
-A marriage licensing bureau
-A citizenship registry
My point is eharmony is just a FORUM, it's just a venue. It can make up WHATEVER rules it wants. You, as an american citizen, can become an ONLINE DATING SERVICE PROVIDER just like eharmony. And you can do just like chemistry.com and state that one of your 'competitors' rejects people for 'no reason'. Yeah, uh huh. Whatever closes the deal right?
I'm mystified as to why people care so much about whether or not they were accepted by Eharmony. Personally I've tried to 'break' the eharmony questionnaire myself to see what it is I have to say to get rejected-granting that it's something I'd personally be comfortable with lying about and I CAN'T DO IT.
I was a member of eharmony for a while. I even dated someone briefly. He was very dysfunctional and very immature. With all due consideration I still feel like eharmony did it's job; the failing of that particular relationship was my own-I expected that since Eharmony did 'all the hard work' all I'd have to do is show up right? That was a total mistake and a damaging assumption and it was all my fault. Eharmony tells you UPFRONT what it can't do and what it hopes to do but there are still people out there that want to be able to leverage whatever advantage they can in order to get whatever it is they want-male or female. Eharmony also tells you what to look out for and recommends what NOT TO DO once you get to the open communication stage.
After short consideration I decided that I needed to wait to find someone that I want to share my life with because I'm not emotionally ready or prepared to take on the responsibility of a relationship or give it the attention and work it needs to succeed at this time. I'm inclined to believe that most people should operate under this principle but I do not require or indict other members or organizations of society who don't employ this philosophy nor should I be able to. I'm just mystified that so many people get hung up over the 'option' of whether or not a service that they themselves pay to join is open to everyone and whether or not it rejects these other people. Eharmony does a better job than Great Expectations, Perfect Match, Match.com and Chemistry in that it has built a user friendly web based interface that is affordable, easy to use and pretty straight forward. People just need to get into a better habit of reading ALL THE FINE PRINT before they go accusing a company of discrimination that operates in a free market place especially if it's a company that they don't own shares in, sit on the board for or are not currently negotiating buying out the ownership of that company.