Re: Blood Soundtrack Unbearable - TRUE!
by
Trainspotter type
02/22/2008, 3:32 PM #
I, too, found Greenwood's score unbearable.
This film's score is a complete joke and the fault largely resides with the choices of this oftentimes pretentious and perverse director, PTA. The score is far too attention-seeking and emotionally inconsistent. Although I applaud a director that takes a risk with an atypical score for a Hollywood movie, this one misfires too often to be considered successful.
I thought the score for Blood was odd and basically terrible because it didn't do what that movie badly needed -- namely, to be given it some heart and emotional resonance.
But afterwards I re-thought my first impression-- most scores are so predictable and safe and many are just crappy (I expect Slate readers are familiar with the term "mickey mousing") -- why, then, do I complain when someone tries to do something completely different? I am still a bit conflicted about it.
I went to see "Blood" for a second time for a number of reasons, and the score was a bit more tolerable, but still inadequate.
I enjoyed this writers comparison between this score and the far superior one in No Country.
NB -- Greenwood's score didn't get nominated for an Oscar because it didn't qualiify. [Best Original Score is for music specifically written for a movie, not "the best bits of existing music we felt went well with the images"]
But it should have not made the cut purely bc it's not good enough.