Wouldn't it have just been cheaper and simplier
by
steelbucket
07/01/2007, 7:27 PM #
to buy Saddam's oil off him rather than invade the country?
And if the USA wanted to block Iran why didn't they simply do what they had done during the 80's when Iraq was supported with military aid and intelligence?
After all its not as if there are any moral issues here. The USA, and the rest of us, were happy to turn a blind eye to Saddam gassing the Kurds back in the 80's. Bush senior was also happy to turn his back on the shia's who revolted against Saddam immediately after the Gulf war, and were slaughtered in their thousands.
Funny how, following the 2003 invasion, all those butchered by Saddam were then used as a reason why he needed to be got rid off but nobody complained very loudly at the actual time when he was ording all this killing.
As for all that oil in the middle east, well the unfortuate fact is that it actually belongs to them and not us. So we can either force them to "sell" it to us at gunpoint, or we can buy it on the open market, if they chose to sell it to us.
However, wouldn't it make more sense to reduce our dependence on oil in the first place?
Or do we end up having to fight it out with China, who are currently buying up as many barrels as they can get?