I don't understand Phipps's dismissal of this summer's roster in his opening. Either it was a poorly worded argument (i.e. the audiences haven't been receptive this summer to big blockbusters--also not true), a really cheap segue for his "look ahead," or he's been under a rock for the past 2 months.
Any summer that contains closing chapters of big blockbuster series (Spiderman 3, Pirates 3, Shrek 3, Ocean's 13), revival of a huge blockbuster series "Die Hard," a Harry Potter movie, and a Pixar flick could hardly be called "not good." As another bewildering choice in argument, P uses a 2 decade-old cartoon, aka Transformers, as a sign of a lackluster summer, then goes on to talk about Speedracer as a "relatively high awesomeness" movie. If Transformers is a bad idea for a blockbuster because it's a 20 years old franchise, then how bad would Speedracer be? It's 40 years old!
Am I missing something? Is there some insight that P should be drawing from this article? Or is it just a rather pedestrian preview with a contentious, but not well thought-out premise?