Whatever happened to Moral Hazard?
by
finkyboy
02/04/2008, 4:09 PM #
Here, here. Cut your losses, take your lumps, reap what ye have sowed.
Government bailouts are not the way to go, it just convinces firms (and individuals) that they can act recklessly in the future because the last time they did and things went belly up, Uncle Sam swooped in and rescued everyone. Case in point: the airline industry. How many times can you go bankrupt, Delta?
And since when has the Fed's mandate been to please traders and market makers? I thought it was all about supervising and regulating the financial system, and preventing bank failures, inflation, etc..? Maybe I'm just being old fashioned.
But the moral hazard argument goes for consumers as well. Predatory lenders aside, what do you have to be smoking to think you can afford a house 5x the price of your last one when your income hasn't budged in the interim? They're mortgages, not miracles. ARM stands for ADJUSTABLE, if you can't be confident that you can afford the payments under the adjusted rates, maybe you're not responsible enough to own your home in the first place.