enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Page 1 of 3 (39 items)   1 2 3 Next >
RACIST LIBERALS
by CaliforniaDreamin
-2 Reply

While black women constitute only 6% of our population, they get 36% of the abortions.

This genocidal evil is promoted by godless leftists.
Liberals call butchering innocent, unborn babies "choice."

However the babies' fathers have no "choice."
Their grandparents have no "choice."
Most important of all, the babies themselves have no "choice."

"Choice" is a liberal euphemism for murder.

Roe V. Wade was argued with the lie that Norma McCorvey was raped. She wasn't.

Today, Norma McCorvey works tirelessly to reverse the evil she originated. Over 30,000,000 dead babies, all on account of the lie of "choice."

<link>

Re: RACIST LIBERALS
by thewolf05827
So was Norma McCorvey lying then, or is she lying now?
Re: RACIST LIBERALS
by CaliforniaDreamin

Wolf, Norma McCorvey claimed that she was pregnant when she initiated Roe V. Wade. I made that very clear.

Leftists can't stand it when one of their own changes sides.
Only when a conservative switches to your Dark Side do you champion "change."

Re: RACIST LIBERALS
by CaliforniaDreamin

Incidentally, Bill Clinton turned his back on the Rwandan Genocide, where 800,000 Tutsis were butchered by Hutus.

Obviously this was because being a good Democrat, Clinton is a racist. He sent in the U.S. military to save the white Bosnians. Oh, and Bosnia had no WMDs and was not a threat to America.

Re: RACIST LIBERALS
by thewolf05827

"your Dark Side" I'm conservative enough to make Ronald Reagan look like some kind of bedwetting New Dealer, yet I still recognize that Norma McCorvey is a lifelong kook, and trying to argue abortion citing anything she has ever said or done-- and posting pictures of mangled fetuses-- puts you right there alongside her in the kook ranks.

Re: RACIST LIBERALS
by The_Rodfather
LOL, like the fathers are around to help support the woman financially. LOLOLOLOL
Re: RACIST LIBERALS
by The_Rodfather
let me guess, you dont want to support the woman and the child with your tax dollars in the form of welfare. So, the woman has a choice, raise the child in poverty, live in poverty, never have a better life, or end the pregnancy and work towards bettering herself so she can make a positive difference later. She will meet her maker in the end and then the decision will be made what is to become of her. It's not our choice to make or don't you believe what read? Or are you just being self righteous?
PRO-ABORTION RODFATHER
by CaliforniaDreamin

The-Rodfather wrote:

let me guess, you dont want to support the woman and the child with your tax dollars in the form of welfare. So, the woman has a choice, raise the child in poverty, live in poverty, never have a better life, or end the pregnancy and work towards bettering herself so she can make a positive difference later. She will meet her maker in the end and then the decision will be made what is to become of her. It's not our choice to make or don't you believe what read? Or are you just being self righteous?

==============

CaliforniaDreamin responds to the typical liberal:

1. Liberals always use "poverty" as a whipping stick. Support our socialist big-government tax and spend programs, or else ...

In fact, "poverty" is a relative term. America's "poor" live better than the average European. I've been to Europe many, many times. I've also been to Asia, and seen how they live.
Funny thing is, the "poor" people you liberals are always pretending to support and defend

A. Spend $1.50 to $2.00 for every dollar of income they report

B. Have a high ratio of color television sets and air conditioners and dishwashers and cars, none of which I had when growing up

C. Move up the scale of income as they get older and gain work experience

2. If death is preferable to a live in what you call "poverty," then clearly you should be for killing people who are poor and miserable (at least you put those two conditions hand in glove)

That being the case, what other poor people would you have killed?

3. "Compassion" is not lobbying for bigger government and higher taxes, as liberals do.
Real compassion is reaching into your own pocket and giving. Liberals don't do this. Take Hanoi John Kerry, please. Kerry and his "wife" paid only about 5% effective tax rate because they defer all their income with tax exempt bonds. Meanwhile Kerry owns a $9,000 bicycle, a yacht "Scaramouche," and several mansions.

He gives little to charity. Typical of liberals.
Read the book "Who Really Cares." It thoroughly documents liberal greed and avarice and lack of "compassion."

4. I'm sure glad my mother didn't follow the line of "if you're poor, abort your babies." I have a very fine life after being brought up by a divorced and quite poor mother.

After a life of working hard and smart and investing wisely, my investments earned $550,000 last year.

Re: PRO-ABORTION RODFATHER
by OldGaffer
So what is your point?
Re: PRO-ABORTION RODFATHER
by middleview

Not long ago you claimed to need help with your taxes because you were just squeeking by at times.

Investments....unearned income. Weren't you also against upping the minimum wage? Did you know that the first time since Roe v. Wade that there was a decline in abortions was when Clinton was president?

Re: PRO-ABORTION RODFATHER
by le-idiot

middle,

are you saying that the clintons were an effective form of birth control (i agree) or newborns were sold by the teenager's parents?

either way, i understand...

Abortion rates
by middleview

Neither. The birth rate did not change. The abortion rate (as a percentage of live births) declined because the economy for people at the low end of the economic spectrum, improved dramatically.

At least that is anybody's best guess.

HYPOCRITICAL CONSERVATIVES
by Liberal Patriot
CaliforniaDreamin:

While black women constitute only 6% of our population, they get 36% of the abortions.

This genocidal evil is promoted by godless leftists.
Liberals call butchering innocent, unborn babies "choice."

However the babies' fathers have no "choice."
Their grandparents have no "choice."
Most important of all, the babies themselves have no "choice."

"Choice" is a liberal euphemism for murder.

Roe V. Wade was argued with the lie that Norma McCorvey was raped. She wasn't.

Today, Norma McCorvey works tirelessly to reverse the evil she originated. Over 30,000,000 dead babies, all on account of the lie of "choice."

The problem with your type of thinking is that you shotgun your thoughts and blame "liberals" for it all. I am one of those "godless" Liberals who happens to think that a womans choice should be limited to those who are raped or whose lives would be in danger or that the child may be hopelessly deformed and retarded where "living" would be one short history of constant pain. I think that responsible, healthy adults who do not practice safe or controlled sex should bear the responsibility of raising a healthy child.

I take offense to your use of the term "godless" in a most hateful manner. One would think it is you who are godless in your uncompromising vehemence. So be careful when you choose to spit at atheists in your very unreligious fashion. It is likely that they are more pleasant, more understanding and less apt to jump to conclusions than your typical myth hypocrite.

And if "choice" is a 'liberal' euphanism for murder then "War" is a 'neocons' euphanism for premeditated genocide and wholesale grand larceny. Especially if it is unfounded.

Re: Abortion rates
by le-idiot

i'm from the coalfields. middle...and a lot of pregnant roman catholic girls just took bus rides to nyc or binghamton to have a d and c...

also, there were local practitioners as well...

the philadelphia sanitary authority reported a markedly sharp decline in aborted fetuses appearing in their drains shortly after roe v. wade.

i choaked on my alphabeta soup that my mom served me when i came home from lunch at grade school (remember when that was possible?) when the pa supreme court voted against legal abortion and it was announced on the radio just before paul harvey. my mom yelled the following at me:

'nine corrupt men aren't going to tell a woman what to do with her body!'

it really isn't a legal or religious question, is it...unless you're corrupt, stupid or both?

women keep 'em guessin'...noh?

Re: HYPOCRITICAL CONSERVATIVES
by Davelias12

"Choice" is a liberal euphemism for murder."

Slander is the Republican form of discussion.

You have absolutely no right to determine the choices other people make in their lives. You know nothing of their situations; all you desire to do is inflict your opinion upon them and inhibit them from making a decision that has no impact on you whatsoever. It's self-righteous and morally bankrupt to believe that your pius attitude should supercede someone's ability to make their own choices.

Page 1 of 3 (39 items)   1 2 3 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML