Go to Ask.com


enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Are you voting for Ron Paul?
by gadzooks

I read on TP that Ron Paul is a popular man on this board. After what I read here last summer I am not surprised.

Paul's alliance with neo-Confederates helps explain the views his newsletters have long espoused on race. Take, for instance, a special issue of the Ron Paul Political Report, published in June 1992, dedicated to explaining the Los Angeles riots of that year. "Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began," read one typical passage. According to the newsletter, the looting was a natural byproduct of government indulging the black community with "'civil rights,' quotas, mandated hiring preferences, set-asides for government contracts, gerrymandered voting districts, black bureaucracies, black mayors, black curricula in schools, black tv shows, black tv anchors, hate crime laws, and public humiliation for anyone who dares question the black agenda." It also denounced "the media" for believing that "America's number one need is an unlimited white checking account for underclass blacks." To be fair, the newsletter did praise Asian merchants in Los Angeles, but only because they had the gumption to resist political correctness and fight back. Koreans were "the only people to act like real Americans," it explained, "mainly because they have not yet been assimilated into our rotten liberal culture, which admonishes whites faced by raging blacks to lie back and think of England."

This "Special Issue on Racial Terrorism" was hardly the first time one of Paul's publications had raised these topics. As early as December 1989, a section of his Investment Letter, titled "What To Expect for the 1990s," predicted that "Racial Violence Will Fill Our Cities" because "mostly black welfare recipients will feel justified in stealing from mostly white 'haves.'" Two months later, a newsletter warned of "The Coming Race War," and, in November 1990, an item advised readers, "If you live in a major city, and can leave, do so. If not, but you can have a rural retreat, for investment and refuge, buy it." In June 1991, an entry on racial disturbances in Washington, DC's Adams Morgan neighborhood was titled, "Animals Take Over the D.C. Zoo." "This is only the first skirmish in the race war of the 1990s," the newsletter predicted. In an October 1992 item about urban crime, the newsletter's author--presumably Paul--wrote, "I've urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense. For the animals are coming." That same year, a newsletter described the aftermath of a basketball game in which "blacks poured into the streets of Chicago in celebration. How to celebrate? How else? They broke the windows of stores to loot." The newsletter inveighed against liberals who "want to keep white America from taking action against black crime and welfare," adding, "Jury verdicts, basketball games, and even music are enough to set off black rage, it seems."

<link>

Re: Are you voting for Ron Paul?
by The_Watcher

Paul denies writing any of that crap but made no attempt to stop it from being published in his name. Not only that, Paul's group still won't look into it today. I guess they think we should all just forget about it.

I'll bet this woke up a few Paul supporters.

Re: Seems like there's a lot of things on the internet
by MWG

supposedly reflecting Ron Paul's views that he denies.

Makes you wonder if there are others speaking in his name, disinformation being created about him, or he's disavowing previous positions and trying to re-invent himself.

If he ever becomes a serious contender, no doubt there will need to be a big "fact vs. crap" investigation to see what his real previous statements/views/positions were.

As for now, I think he's a non-issue.

What difference does it make?
by Boltlady
Paul's supporters understand that this issue was thoroughly hashed out several years ago and his constituency has re-elected him several times since. It's accepted by those of us who care, that he didn't write the articles. Even though it was done in his name he promotes freedom for all people. There were obviously those who abused that.

The very fact that you came racing over here to make sure that his name is sullied as much as possible is more proof that he's becoming more of a force to be reckoned with. If that wasn't true there would be no reason for anyone to bother bringing up old news.
LOL. Boltlady, Ms Radical Activist of 1970,
by skeppy3

claims that Ron Paul is "more of a force to be reckoned with"

What, you figure Paul will stage a counter march to your next International ANSWER parade?

Skeptical roars with laughter. Eh.

You?

View as RSS news feed in XML