I read this article, and became aware of a previously unknown event, called the "Bradley effect". Though you carefully tried to infer that Obama's supporters may have gone overboard in trying to influence the direction of the respondents that they were interviewing, I fail to see how they somehow lied.

It seems to me that this article should have been entitled, "The Bradley Effect in full affect"

Now you are guilty of the very thing you are alleging happened with the polling!

I think they LIED.

The title is misleading because it would be HILLARY's supporters that lied, not Obama's. For the polling discrepancy to be from lying to pollsters, people who voted for Hillary would have to have lied and said they had voted for Obama.