Re: Rice too weak to be a neo-con
by
Steve-R
12/18/2007, 10:08 AM #
Rice’s supposed “rise” is an optical illusion, perceived in relation to the precipitous fall of Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush. Rice has survived merely because she possesses the talent of walking in place with the bearing of a high-minded intellectual and diplomat. She walks among bold actors and ideologues, while she herself is timid and aloof. This allows her to wrap herself in success when things appear to be going well, and to distance herself from failure when things are going badly.
I tend to agree with the point, though, that Rice isn’t an ideologue. She has a conservative bent, but she’s not a forceful enough thinker or personality to adhere strongly to an ideology. She simply is a very polished and articulate tag-along.
With this book (and a couple others on the way), Rice is trying to pave the way for her post-Bush career. I can’t imagine that she would have much of one. No 2008 presidential candidate will run, let alone win, on the Bush foreign policy record. So Rice will have no place in the next administration. And it will be a long time, if ever, for Iraq to become stabilized enough, or the electorate to be ready to let go enough, for Rice to try for any political career of her own. Rather, she’s destined for a professorship or a senior appointment with a right-wing think tank, in other words, obscurity. Which is where she belongs.