Re: To Know Us Is To Love Us
by
Usama2
11/15/2007, 10:27 AM #
Slaterbait, I had hoped your insight would have been more profound given your username.
The rawest, truest source of power of a people is its military. A people exist or do not as a nation, country, or entity based on their military. Militaries are the first to make contact between people. They pave the way for diplomacy, business trade, social relations, cultural exchange, etc. This is how mankind has lived. Only in the past 60 years have nations been formed without militaries, yet they are unofficially under the military protection of greater military powers (eg. Costa Rica).
This realpolitikal axiom being true, then today's global economy which Slaterbait portrays as centered around America should be examined retroactively to see how, why, and when did so many nations place so much of their nation's surplus wealth in American investments.
And very likely, the best way to ascertain the hows, whys, and whens would be to examine the military relations between America and the rest of the world.
Take Japan for example. It is fairly obvious that prior to WWII, Japan was entirely self sufficient and invested its wealth into its own economy, which gave life to its imperial sprawl. Indeed, as Japan's investments enabled developments in energy industries (oil refineries) manufacturing plants, etc. Japan developed a national thirst for more energy, more resources, more economic opportunities to feed its growth (sounds a lot like America today).
After WWII, America occupied Japan and invested 100s of millions into rebuilding Japan's capital infrastructure. America also forced into Japan''s constitution that America would be responsible for and control Japan's national interests beyond its borders. Thus Japan was guided to focus solely on internal economic development.
Key observation, the capitalist economic model appears to force a bulging economic power to engage in "imperial" expansion beyond its borders to maintain, sustain its rate of growth.