enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Fatahland Occupation of Palestine
by pace pace

Can no one bring themselves to utter the word:

O C C U P A T I O N ?

Does anyone comprehend the issue here?

The word is illegal, injust immoral

O C C U P A T I O N !

Please talki straight to the public!

Letter to the editor
by PhilistineTheArtLover

The Irish Times. 6/19/07

Madam, - As a Palestinian, I am appalled that the European
Union and the United States have backed Mahmoud Abbas's
so-called "emergency government" in Israeli-occupied Ramallah.
The Palestinian Basic Law makes no provision for such a
development.

Hamas, no matter what one thinks of it, won the January 2006
election fair and square. On the eve of its victory, it had
already observed a one-year unilateral truce with Israel.
According to the Israeli human rights group B'Tselem, Israel
killed almost 700 Palestinians in 2006, of whom half were
unarmed civilians, and 141 were children. By contrast,
Palestinians killed 23 Israelis.

On what basis, therefore, did the EU shun the elected
representatives of an occupied people, while allowing their
occupiers to continue their depredations - wilful killing of
civilians and land theft for Jewish-only settlements - without
any response? Hamas tried to enter mainstream politics through
the front door - explicitly modelling its policies on those of
the IRA in the context of the Irish peace process. The door
was slammed shut in its face as the US funded and armed
unaccountable and corrupt militias whose job was to undermine
the results of a democratic election, and the EU meekly agreed
to impose cruel sanctions against an occupied people.

EU officials may comfort themselves that they are supporting a
"legitimate" Palestinian government. As a student of European
history, I see a close parallel with the collaborationist
second World War regimes of Quisling in Norway and Pétain in
France. Has Europe really learned nothing from its own
history? Has Ireland learned nothing from its own painful
past, as well as the spectacular success of the peace process
in the North?

The result of these short-sighted EU policies will be to
deepen the split among Palestinians and give Israel a free
hand to continue its violent colonisation of illegally
occupied lands. - Yours, etc,

Mr. Ali Abunimah

Re Collaborationist Hamas
by pace pace

Since Israel had a hand in instigating Hamas as a counter weight agains Arafat, and since Hamas fulfill Israel's endless need to have a non negotiationist partner in its rationale for occupation... wouldn't it appear as if the Election of Hamas (tainted by the discouragement and strangulation of the P.C. preceding) way the actual collaborationist moment?

Doesn't the pairing of Hamas and the Israeli rightwing actually serve the zionist cause far better than the support for a seemingly cooperative, albeit questionable Fatah-led (internally exiled) half-loaf solution?

The suggestion that support for Hamas now=Peace and justice and the end to the occupation is absurd. Hamas like the occupation- every bit as much as the Israeli Right does. Those are your collaborating evils- not the demnand OF THE PEOPLE to shed the Hamas albatross.

Re: Letter to the editor
by Justme

You asked; "On what basis, therefore, did the EU shun the elected representatives of an occupied people,"

That is simple to answer.

Because Hamas is a fanatical bunch of terrorists! The fact that a majority of voters agree with terrorism and hatred does not mean any nation has to support such killers.

View as RSS news feed in XML