Given the lack of substance in the article, I now understand the over-the-top title. Might I recommend that editors review articles in the future? ND fans see so many of these types of articles that you need to be better armed when you come to the table.

"It's true that Notre Dame has suffered a dip in its talent level, attributable to poor recruiting by Weis' predecessor Tyrone Willingham."

"This first season was seen as the start of a new dynasty. In truth, Notre Dame was bound to improve, given the natural maturation of a couple of excellent Willingham recruiting classes."

I guess every action does have an opposite and equal reaction.