Emily gets it wrong on this one...
by
Demosthenes2
10/23/2007, 9:46 AM #
Did you see the Slate video cast on the guy who asked what to do about the open condom wrapper found in his wife's purse? Yeesh--Emily, I really have to take issue with the advice on this one--just getting over it is a recipe for disaster.
I’m sorry, but the guy is married with young children and finds an empty condom wrapper in his wife’s purse—he (minimally) has a right to know what’s going on. You begin by assuming the worst case scenario and that his wife cheated on him and then proceed to state that because there’s no further evidence of infidelity he should DROP IT? Here’s a thought—maybe she just got better at covering her tracks, or maybe it did blow in from the freeway, through an open window and land in her purse as she posits. Maybe she’ll solve Fermat’s theorem while driving, but the odds are against it.
The fact that her immediate positions are 1) the wind blew it in the car (the infidelity equivalent of the dog ate my homework—if that had really happened do you want to run a probability study on the odds of it breezing into her purse?!) or that a co-worker put it there, but in either event you missed the far more alarming issue here.
The REAL issue is that she’s unwilling to discuss it insisting that his trust in her fidelity be absolute despite very compelling evidence to the contrary. This 1) speaks to an abusive level of control need in the relationship and 2) the fact that she’s been unwilling to address it for a year speaks to a lack of communication that spells the death knell of that relationship sooner or later.
Further, you rightly point out that there are young children involved—all the more reason to resolve this in therapy and work on communication trust and control issues. There is virtually no possibility of a loving and nurturing environment for these kids to grow up in with that level of communication and controlling behavior in a relationship. It is precisely because of the presence of young children that he has a responsibility to ensure clear and honest communication in the marriage to create a healthy and balanced relationship to model for the children.
Infidelity is frequently a deal breaker in marriage—it can be overcome if both parties are willing to address it and move past it, but there has to be that communication or they’re fooling themselves and modeling unhealthy behavior for the children.
If there’s no infidelity than she should have no qualms about working through the trust issues and improving communication in the marriage. If she’s unwilling to do that then it’s a question of when, not if, this blows up in his face and in the interim the relationship dynamics modeled are harmful ones.
Seriously—if the positions were reversed would you counsel the wife to simply get over it? For the sake of the children—as if that’s in their best interests? Typically you counsel therapy when a partner is caught internet surfing erotica and “emotional affairs” with internet relationships—why the lower standard in the face of more concrete evidence that the relationship fundamentals have been breached?
Oh—and the easy pass line comes across as just insensitive rather than cute. Evidence of infidelity is like finding termite holes in the walls of your home. Address it and find out what it is and take the necessary measures or face the devastating consequences later. It won’t go away or get better by ignoring it.
Letter writer—if you’re reading this—insist on therapy and addressing these issues. If your wife refuses, hire a private investigator and a good lawyer—those would be sad steps to take but the refusal to address it and insistence on your blind trust is too much to ask for given the circumstances and she ought to be willing to work on both the communication and control issues. If she’s not—for you and for the children—you need to address that yourself lest those children model the same sort of relationship dynamic.