enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Great Article Ruined by Poor Programming
by bkharmony
+2 Reply
As a Classical Dilettante, I found this article fascinating. I would love to follow along and hear the examples, but Slate's audio "embedding" is straight outta 1992 (not to mention very Mac-unfriendly).

Please, Slate, fix this. Why can every 12-year old's MySpace page have embedded mp3s, but not your publication?
Re: Great Article Ruined by Poor Programming
by inedal

i was unable to hear the musical excerpts! how can this be fixed? any tips out there?

thanks!

i have an ordinary PC, not apple don't know why it doesn't work on my excellent Winamp thing.

- not a hi-tech guy!

Terrible audio
by markiep

This very good article was made very frustrating by the abyssmal quality of the sound clips.

If I were going by the clips, I would conclude that Haydn and Mozart sound the same -- like total crap. Why are these clowns famous?

It sounds like these were recorded on the very first wax drums, transferred to an 8-Track that was left on the dashboard of an abandoned car, then "ripped" to a digital file using a condenser mic from a 80s-era boom box at a bitrate of 16 bps.

No seriously, GOOD JOB.

Yeah, really, what's the deal with the sound?
by tonto_goldberg

Does this mqke me a Classical Dilletante as well, or do I need a degree or certificate or something?

The sound is pretty bad and some clips didn't come through at all. I thought the text was a bit presumptious and filled with music-critic jargon but out here in the boonies we take what we can get. It's just good to read anything about classical music. Anything at all.

View as RSS news feed in XML