Re: If it wasn't for Newt, Trent, W, Delay and Cheney......
by
UPNYA2
10/18/2007, 9:34 AM #
Eusux, when this is all said and done, exactly what is your problem with Bush anyway?
All this shit you cry about, seriously, who do you think would have done what differently?
Like "After 3,000+ Americans were killed on US soil." You state that as if Bush somehow "allowed" this and you know of someone who would not. Do you? Is THAT whats up your ass? Please, elaborate, don't SPECULATE, hindsight is ALWAYS 20-20.
"And Osma Bin Forgotten got away with murder." Possibly, or we could still be after him AND fighting a war, whichever you feel promotes your personal opinions.
"...cut taxes for ALL Americans,..." He DID. Get over it.
"Supporting both military actions on US treasury bonds sold to China, japan and Saudi Arabia. If we had to pay for this war today it would cost us an additional $7,800 per tax payer, on top of what you already pay. " Unlike WHOM? Who is it YOU feel would fight a war without doing somet thing like this? Or, hell, for that matter, why just bitch about a war because you oppose it? Who do you know of who would operate our government strictly off what they took in? Its a BS "requirement" you do not have for ALL governmemt spending, nor for ALL politicians, why Bush and why just the war?
"It has been a Conservative body since 2000 when SCOTUS coronated King Geroge. get real...Bush appointed radicalized judges that are Conservative." HUH? Sheer, petty personal speculation on YOUR part, hoss, with NO basis in fact. ALL these people are nominated by whomever is the president, based on his opinion of them but they all also go through an approval process. ALL have. Also, the decision of the SCOTUS was going result in SOMEONE winning, when it happened to NOT be your boy, they sucked. Had it been your boy, you would be on here championing the way our system works as it is designed to do, so get over it.
The economy.
What is your problem with that? Do you exist less well than ever? How is anything bad affecting you? Is it? Or, in fact, is it just that "some" are affected negatively, "somewhere"? Personally, I think ANY president has very little to do that will actually control our economy. I also don't think our President can or should have much of an affect on where a business elects to locate, how big they must be or how many employees they must keep or what the limit should be on what they pay their employees, but if you want the government to control all that, I certainly see why you want them to provide everyone with food, shelter, cloths, vehicles, insurance, child care, retirement, medical coverage, paid leave, vacations, college educations, spa days (our mental health is as important as our physical, right)?