enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Clothes are directly proportional to Wars
by wavestory
You will notice that the nations that wear the most clothing and have the most concern about modesty are the same nations that are most inclined to make war (Muslims and Americans). It is only the Devil who inspires these people.
Re: ...are directly proportional ...
by patinjapan

name those Muslims who have started wars

Americans I know, Bush & Chaney

But not proportional to actually winning the conflict
by senbassador
"In warfare, the simplest uniform wins."
Re: ...are directly proportional ...
by wavestory
There are too many Muslim wars and conflicts to list here. Just go to Wikipedia and search for "Muslim Wars." I am suprised you forgot about the biggie on September 11, 2001.
Re:"about the biggie on September 11, 2001"
by Screaming_chicken

So the acts of a handfull of individuals constitues a "biggie"?

I suppose you're one of the 30% who still think that Bush is doing a great job as well?

Re: ...are directly proportional ...
by Rick Norwood

It's a nice thought, but it isn't true. Archeological digs turn up skeletons all the time with no trace of fabric but carrying a weapon. Wars are caused by overpopulation. Wars are caused by egocentric maniacs, such as Alexander the Great and Napoleon. Wars are caused by politicians looking for votes. But wars are not caused by clothing.

I understand your wish, though. It would be good to live in a country ruled by people who were not insane.

Re: ...are directly proportional ...
by WriterWriter

The "biggie on September 11th" was not anything to do with Muslim PEOPLE (why do people use the word "Muslim" the same as they use cancer?)

There is so much evidence out there that Sept. 11th was planned far in advance of that date. Your "president" knew about it and he said so, on camera, when he said he "saw the first plane go into the first building" on a TV set in the grade1 classroom he was in. THAT IS FALSE. There is no footage (known, anyway) of that plane hitting that building, because those attacks were supposed to be random. But they WERE NOT.

There is extensive eyewitness video of bombs going off in those buildings and eyewitness testimony that the control room of WTC1 being destroyed BEFORE the first plane hit.

INFORM yourselves people. Governments ride roughshod over their populace because the populace believes everything the media feeds them.

www.zeitgeistmovie.com (2 hours that will certainly change your opinions)

www.loosechange.com

www.stupid-files.blogspot.com

As for whether it damages children to see their parents naked, no, it doesn't unless the parents freak out. Everyone is naked under their clothes. Children develop their own modesty at around age 10 (unless they're exposed to inappropriate behaviour on the part of the ADULTS around them).


What's really damaging for children is religion and the crazy, weird indoctrination that goes along with that.

Re: ...are directly proportional ...
by Agamemnon
patinjapan:

name those Muslims who have started wars

Americans I know, Bush & Chaney

Hmmm... How about Muhammad's conquest of Mecca?

Ever hear of the Ottoman Empire?

How about the 1948 Arab Isreali war?

Iran vs Iraq?

I could go on...

If We were all naked
by Heleva

then noone could hide a weapon.

Guns on the otherhand, well so many are outgunned aren't they? };>~

Re: ...are directly proportional ...
by Agamemnon

There is so much evidence out there that Sept. 11th was planned far in advance of that date. Your "president" knew about it and he said so, on camera, when he said he "saw the first plane go into the first building" on a TV set in the grade1 classroom he was in. THAT IS FALSE. There is no footage (known, anyway) of that plane hitting that building, because those attacks were supposed to be random. But they WERE NOT.

Give me a break. Who in their right mind would include G. Bush in a conspiracy, especially one on this scale? The guy's a moron, he would have made far more blunders then that by now. They would have had to kill him too. I don't believe there was a US conspiracy behind 9/11, but if I did there's no way I'd even consider the idea that G. Bush was somehow involved. He's just too dumb to be an active participant with insider knowledge.
Re: ...are directly proportional ...
by Heleva

"Give me a break. Who in their right mind would include G. Bush in a conspiracy, especially one on this scale?"

The tinfoil hat people. There guns are small, very small.

Re: ...are directly proportional ...
by Heleva

There = Their.

View as RSS news feed in XML