enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
OJ Simpson
by amarica

I am disgusted to see any time or writing given to OJ Simpson. He insults the memory of the two people he undoubtedly murdered in cold blood. Then he has the nerve to proceed to whine about "his collectables". Even if they were his once upon a time, they belong to the Goldmens who won a lawful judgement against him.

Now he is making plans to profit from his latest foolishness and to find a way out of settling up on his lawful obligations. By all rights he should be shunned by all news media and ignored for the sake of those who have suffered at his hands. A fair jury found him guilty in the Civil Trial, guilty of cold blooded murder. He flaunts his crimes in our faces and smuggly makes this statement, "That killing Nicole and that Goldman dude back in 1994, who were really asking for it, not that I'm saying I did it, but if I did do it then it wasn't that big a deal, she had it coming, that no-good blood-sucking c—"

He is an example of the worst of the worst produced out of this generations "celebrities."

Re: OJ Simpson
by MtnKat

I almost lost my lunch when I went online and had to look at that face. Is there any particular reason it has to be so BIG? Downsize or I switch to CNN.

Re: OJ Simpson
by ken457

I notice nothing was said in your artice about the first Jury of his peers who judged him Not Guilty.

If someone writes a book about, say a bombing, or a murder, that does not necessarily make them "the" murderer. If so, our prison system would be full of writers of fiction books and magazine articles.

And by the way, the prison system is full of individuals who people thought were guilty, and were not, as has been proven several times over the past years by DNA evidence. If you were a juror, and you had a doubt about a persons guilt or innocence, would you err on the side of guilty just to save face later?

A civil trial I believe if I recall only calls for a preponderence of evidence for a person to be deemed guilty. Being an estranged husband of an individual and already having a histoy of disagreement does not make you a murderer, but you could surely lose you rear end and all the fixtures in a civil trial based on the same evidence. In a civil tral the glove doesn't have to fit and might not have to be the same color.

View as RSS news feed in XML