How could OJ not have known that he would be caught if he was involved in a heist where the witnesses could identify him?

Even Las Vegas Law Enforcement has rules against armed robbery and thuggery.

Man is he stupid or on drugs or what?

Hey, it's time for something meaningful to say. First of all before you speak you should know all of the facts in a case. If you knew somone had stolen something very near and dear to you would not ask the cops who had tried to set you up for the murder of two white people for help. You would try and get the items back yourself. The question you should be asking yourself is, if OJ and anything associated with him is so vile, then what are these white guys doing in a Las Vegas hotel trying to sell these items that belong to him. I guess he is not so vile as long as white people can profit off his back.

Think

Back to my original point though, if OJ and some thugs are going to barge in and take something by gunpoint from people that were sure to recognize him, shouldn't he at least have tried to disguise himself? Perhaps a lone ranger mask or at least a nylon over his head.

What struck me as very strange about this is that it is almost like OJ wanted to get caught. Using a gun during a robbery leads to real jail time. I am not sure about Nevada but in many States it will get you five years minimum.

The judicial system today is a sham. From the court systems down to law enforcement. The innocent are pretty much like sheep to the wof, and there is no sheep dog anymore. We have lost all common sense in law enforcement and law interpretation.

I would have done the same thing if someone stole something of mine. I totally aggree with the statement of not going to a group who already tried to frame you in the first place. O.J. was judged not guilty by a jury of his peers. That should have been the end of it.

I respect law enforcement officials immensely, however if this had happened to me I would have to decide if I would commit bodily harm to an individual who I knew stole my property. ( by the way, has anyone tried to get police officials to look for stolen property? Is a useless endeavor 99.5% of the time, and recovery is usually a fluke with todays smarter street wise criminals). Esecially in this man's case, where you have to admit the cards are stacked against him. If you have any doubt about it, do something against the law, or for that matter be acused of something against the law, and see just how long it takes to live it down, and get back to a normal life.

To be judged innocent by a jury of your peers means nothing in this day and time. You are guilty until the "Media" says otherwise.