enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Spreading The Wealth Never Created One Job
by WorldlyMrB
-4 Reply

Spreading the Wealth causes the guy you took his money from to hide his money, while the guy who received the confiscated wealth only waits for the next handout.

End Marxism. Hope/Change 2010

<link>

Re: Spreading The Wealth Never Created One Job
by TomFitz

Huh?

Joe the Plumber wasn't going to buy a company. He didn't even have a plumber's license.

He was literally working for cash on the side as a helper.

Almost every claim he made about himself was made up,.

So, why are you repeating it now?

Why Am I Repeating It Now?
by WorldlyMrB

How's Obama's "Spreading the Wealth" Marxist economics doing in creating jobs?

REF: Jobless rate tops 10 pct. for first time since '83190,000 jobs lost in October

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The unemployment rate has surpassed 10 percent for the first time since 1983 -- and is likely to go higher.

<link>

I disagree...
by Kal_Aline

look at all the Czars, and commisars in the Obama administration that have been created by the "community organizer full employment act of 2009."

KA

Re: Spreading The Wealth Never Created One Job
by ARMCX1
In my opinion, the stimulus package was too modest. It got trimmed by the decision to require 60 votes for Senate passage in a futile search for bipartisanship. That allowed Specter, Collins and Snowe to insist on a package that many economist warned would be insufficient. Now, it will be much more difficult to go back and ask for additional stimulus money because the administration argued that $787bn was just right, unemployment would top at 8%, and because deficit hawk arguments are striking a loud receptive chord with elite opinion if not the public. Cutting back federal spending is bad economic policy in the current recession because no one else IS spending! Democrats need to stop seeking Republican support at the cost of effective legislation. If necessary, Democrats need to use reconciliation to pass legislation. The Republicans did not hesitate to do so in 2001 and 2003. PS--Joe the plumber is a fraud from the moment he walked up to Obama until this day.
Re: Spreading The Wealth Never Created One Job
by WorldlyMrB

The real "fraud" is the Marxist in the White House

Re: Spreading The Wealth Never Created One Job
by teigan
How would anyone know that 787bn was not enough since they haven't spent it? It's like everything else the government does, mismanaged. Turning anything over to the government is a mistake, they can't hit their ass with both hands. Of course now the government wants to manage healthcare. How many times do you fools have to be hit in the head to understand that turning anything over to the government to manage is mistake.?
Re: Actually dumb fuck
by kunigunda

Clinton generated 20 million jobs.

Fucking moran.

Oh please
by mom
So concentrating the wealth in the hands of the few creates jobs, right? No, it comes to a dead stop. However, when you spread that wealth around, it continues to spread around. And the more it spreads, the more people are needed to produce whatever is needed.
Re: Spreading The Wealth Never Created One Job
by TomFitz
Yes, it was far to modest. Especially in the area of infrastructure investment. (note that I said investment, not spending).
Re: Spreading The Wealth Never Created One Job
by TomFitz

You could have fooled Henry Ford.

After all, once he started paying workers enough to actually afford the cars they were building, sales doubled and then doubled again and doubled again after that.

Suddenly, the benefits of new industrial technology and productivity growth were being shared with the people who worked in the factories.

What did they do with it?

The bought more stuff being made in other factories.

And everyone's standard of living rose.

Sure, sharing the wealth never created one job. Just ignore the history of the first fifty years of this century!

View as RSS news feed in XML