conservatives rally for something they believe is wrong. God forbid, when you knuckleheads have a rally the media isn't there in all it's glory.

But, then again, you never have to worry about that because the "mainstream media" is so far in the tank for you guys, that will never happen.

Get a grip libs, we're not going to stand by quietly anymore!

10,000.....and three weeks ago a gay rights rally got 200,000.

You guys better get louder...quicker. Or you're going to look like you're in the minority or something.

Yeah, except you guys don't believe it's wrong. Give it five, ten years. You'll be screaming that the public option should be a right that cannot be denied.

democrats try to solve a problem.....

Too bad the tea baggers can't articulate exactly what they think is wrong. This is not socialization of medicine. It is not public funding for abortion. It is not public funding for illegal aliens. It is certainly not related in any way to the holocaust.

What have the republicans offered in answer to the problem? Anything about denying coverage for a pre-existing condition? Nope. Will they keep insurance companies from dropping me once I get sick? No. Is there anything in their plan that would insure those who cannot afford coverage today? No.

What does their plan contain? Limits on law suits. Something that already exists in my state a number of others and which has had no effect on costs. They will allow insurance companies to relocate to states which have no real controls on them and then sell insurance in my state. Nobody seems to see that the credit card companies are located in South Dakota. Did you ever wonder why?

The republicans had control for 6 years and didn't seem to think there was even a problem, now they won't even participate in a reasoned debate on the matter. Their concern is not fixing a problem, it is preventing a fix that might be credited to the democrats.

Conservatives (teabaggers) are rallying these days because they are simply a bunch of sore ass losers who cannot accept the fact that they got their asses handed to them last November by Obama and the American public. This irks cons, so they are acting out in rage one year after the fact. And I'll keep bringing up the observation that it suuuuuureee is weird that all of these protesting 'baggers and birthers are all WHITE people. It's kinda creepy, really.

Yep. It sure is weird.

10,000.....and three weeks ago a gay rights rally got 200,000.

Yep, and you're 0-31 when it comes to getting the gay marraige passed when it comes to a vote on the ballot.

don't know who Michael Steele is do you?

You also need to stop drinking from Pelosi's kool-aid pitcher and realize that the dems are going to get hammered in 2010 elections.

You libs just can't stand it when conservatives rally for something they believe is wrong.

Correct. When it is purely Belief based, and disconnected from reality, then we liberals do have a serious problem with that.

Yes Michael Steele is a wealthy Uncle Tom... and?

Nice work. You really hooked these saps. I would have appreciated more ALL CAPS, but this is a good job. You got 8 replies.

Yeah, the "mainstream media" are "in the tank" for libs, and yet...your rallies are sponsored and organzied by Fox, which then reports on them as if they're "news."

Shit, that's funny....:)

Most of us know it's trolling, but play 'whack-a-mole' with the trolls for fun. It ain't like this is the Oxford Debating Society here on the Fray, after all...:)

reJoinder:

Yeah, the "mainstream media" are "in the tank" for libs, and yet...your rallies are sponsored and organzied by Fox, which then reports on them as if they're "news."

Shit, that's funny....:)

It's much more convenient making your own news than trying to report on news others make. Your cameras and reporters are already there and you don't have to deal with all of that frustrating "objectivity" that always gets in the way.

Murdoch learned much from ol' Willam Randolph Hearst, to be sure...:)

Degsme, any black man that votes Republican is an Uncle Tom? If I were capable, I think I'd be offended.

(and btw, "wealthy" and "Uncle Tom" are contradictions--you can't be a rich and in power and an obseqious slave at the same time. I'da gone with Quisling maybe)