enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Sick Democrats--for Shep
by genedio
+1 Reply
The Next Phase in Health Care Apartheid

By NORMAN SOLOMON

In Washington, “healthcare reform” has degenerated into a sick joke.

At this point, only spinners who’ve succumbed to their own vertigo could use the word “robust” to describe the public option in the healthcare bill that the House Democratic leadership has sent to the floor.

“A main argument was that a public plan would save people money,” the New York Times has noted. But the insurance industry -- claiming to want a level playing field -- has gotten the Obama administration to bulldoze the plan. “After House Democratic leaders unveiled their health care bill [on October 29], the Congressional Budget Office said the public plan would cost more than private plans and only 6 million people would sign up.”

At its best, “the public option” was a weak remedy for the disastrous ailments of the healthcare system in the United States. But whatever virtues the public option may have offered were stripped from the bill en route to the House floor.

What remains is a Rube Goldberg contraption that will launch this country into a new phase of healthcare apartheid.

People who scrape together enough money to buy health insurance will discover that they’re riding in the back of the nation’s healthcare bus. The most “affordable” policies will be the ones with the highest deductibles and the worst coverage.

We’re hearing that large numbers of lower-income Americans will be provided with Medicaid coverage in the next decade. Translation: If funding holds up, they’ll get to hang onto a bottom rung of the healthcare ladder. Many will not be able to get the medical help they need, from primary care providers or specialists.

Not long ago, we were told that the Obama administration was aiming for a public option that could provide coverage to one out of every four Americans. Now the figure is around one out of every fifty.

Not long ago, the idea was that taxpayer-funded subsidies were to be used only for the public option. But now the entire concept has been hijacked by and for the private insurance industry. As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi put it on October 8, private insurance companies “are going to get 50 million new consumers, many of them subsidized by the taxpayers.”

Pelosi was making the argument that the least the insurance industry could do, in return, would be to accept a higher level of taxation. But her comment was a telling acknowledgment that all the “public option” proposals now provide a massive funnel from the U.S. Treasury to the insurance conglomerates. The individual mandate is a monumental giveaway to private insurance firms.

The specter of “healthcare reform” that requires individuals to stretch their personal finances for often-abysmal insurance coverage is the worst of all worlds -- government intrusion for corporate benefit without any guarantees of decent health coverage.

In effect, the individual-mandate requirement tells people that obtaining health coverage is ultimately their own responsibility -- and the quality of the coverage is beside the point. In essence, when it comes to guaranteeing quality healthcare for all, the gist of the policy is: “Let’s not, and say we did.”

The predictable result is reinforcement of vast -- and often deadly -- inequities in access to healthcare.

With Washington making such a corporate mess of “healthcare reform,” the best way to get what we need -- healthcare for all as a human right -- will be to enact single-payer healthcare in one state after another.

But the House Democratic leadership has not been content to serve up a grimly pathetic “healthcare reform” bill. Speaker Pelosi has used her political leverage to quash Congressman Dennis Kucinich’s amendment -- approved months ago by the Education and Labor Committee -- that would grant waivers so that states could create their own single-payer system. Pelosi removed the Kucinich amendment from the House bill.

The California legislature has twice passed a strong single-payer bill, both times vetoed by the state’s current execrable governor. The official position of the California Democratic Party is unequivocally in favor of single-payer healthcare. And yet Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, did what she could to sabotage the single-payer position of her own party in her own state.

Sickening.

Re: Sick Democrats--for Shep
by MaryAnne
Genedio, I gave you a thumbs up on this post.It is not showing. Good example of those who are elected to serve us. Instead they are serving Special Interests and to hell with the people.
Re: Sick Democrats--for Shep
by shep

I cannot debate the trend.. although I would take exception to certain of the details in the author's grim picture... which I concede is probably fairly adequate.

I find myself in the curious position of hoping that the whole Congressional debate is a rope-a-dope... a strategem to sucker the Republicans AND the AHIP bastards AND the Bluedogs.. and that Obama, in Buffalo Soldier 6th Cavalry gear, will ride over the ridge at the last moment to save the settlers, bring justice to the Apaches, and discipline the greedy cattle barons and railroad magnates.

But I am beginning to doubt that will happen.

My personal question is "How in HELL could the AHIP and BigMed bastards have so thoroughly co-opted the Senate as to bring us to this sorry pass?" My codiciliar question is "Was Obama always aware (the crook?) that this road was the one we would eventually travel.. or is he so thoroughly hamstrung (poor bastard?) by Democratic gutlessness and mercenary prostitution that he has no choice?"

I have no choice but to wait and see.. and hope for a very unlikely but awfully gratifying surprise. Damn it.

JAck shep

Your question?
by MaryAnne

My personal question is "How in HELL could the AHIP and BigMed bastards have so thoroughly co-opted the Senate as to bring us to this sorry pass?" My codiciliar question is "Was Obama always aware (the crook?) that this road was the one we would eventually travel.. or is he so thoroughly hamstrung (poor bastard?) by Democratic gutlessness and mercenary prostitution that he has no choice?"

******************************­*******

Why do you think this country does not have a decentt Health Care system? The problem is that with Congress being televised now the average person can see what goes on in Congress. At least the debates are televised, but a good share of that is posturing.

We can now see the corruption of our Government in living color on our big screen TV's. Almost makes you nostolgic for the old black and white with 3 whole stations.

"I am beginning to doubt that will happen"
by genedio

Now you suspect Obama as being either crooked or incompetent. You've come far. Of course this is not to say the Repubs are not even worse and have no solutions to offer besides...don't get sick, and if you do, die quickly!

The thing that galls me about the Democrat plan is the individual mandate: throwing the responsibility on all of us individually to purchase private (in most cases for profit) health insurance or be fined. And this coming during the worst recession in 26 years, at least. That smacks of 'let them eat cake'. It is a textbook example of fascism in my book--to require people to patronize private business under pain of penalty. Instead of learning from European solutions, the Dems crafted a 1,990 page Rube Goldberg plan more complicated than the Medicare drug plan passed by the DeLay congress in 2005. That the Repukes call it "socialism" is idiocy. But if the Repukes aren't as dumb as we think, there may be method in their madness, and they may be craftily playing a winning hand. After the folks get saddled with an unpopular mandate to buy crappy and expensive insurance, what is to prevent employers from easing up on providing their workers health insurance? The workers would end up blaming Democrats for this state of affairs. While most people are focused on the potential for more hikes in premiums that the insurance companies are threatening if this bill passes, the reality is that premiums have been rising for years with no 'socialized medicine'.

So premiums will continue rising, employers will stop insuring their workforces, individuals will be stuck with the mandates to buy unaffordable insurance, and government which is borrowing like there's no tomorrow promises to pick up some of the tab for those who don't make enough money to pay for their insurance. Who trusts government? I see a lot more downside than upside.

Re: "I am beginning to doubt that will happen"
by MaryAnne
One more thing.Congress voted to exempt themselves. Very telling,and we need to use that vote to clean house.
View as RSS news feed in XML