enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Why are we still talking about this?
by candoxx

Why the hell are you writing an article about this?

If Americans cannot see through this crap, we deserve what we are going to get.

Re: Why are we still talking about this?
by itsobvious

candoxx:
If Americans cannot see through this crap ...

We can not.

candoxx:
... we deserve what we are going to get ...

We are already getting it.

We have a nation that is made up of a majority - in the last presidential anyhow - that is hopefully and quietly clueless, and a minority that is led by a few permanently and loudly outraged radio talk show hosts who yap endlessly about whatever it is that might pop into their very small minds.

Smug alert
by okakura

itsobvious:

candoxx:
If Americans cannot see through this crap ...

We can not.

candoxx:
... we deserve what we are going to get ...

We are already getting it.

We have a nation that is made up of a majority - in the last presidential anyhow - that is hopefully and quietly clueless, and a minority that is led by a few permanently and loudly outraged radio talk show hosts who yap endlessly about whatever it is that might pop into their very small minds

Okay obvious, I'll bite: tell us of your 'obvious' Middle Way (and I don't mean the Eight-Fold Path of Buddhism).

Just please -- for the love of God --- don't be one of those inane pseudo-Libertarian Ron Paul groupies...

Re: Smug alert
by itsobvious

Do you have any solutions? I don't. I wish I had a big enough ego to be smug about any of this.

It scares me that people like Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, Glen Beck, Carrie Prejean, and all those other loud jerks can command all the media attention. I don't wish to join them at their end of the spectrum or on the other end or even in the middle. I can't imagine Ron Paul or any of his inane groupies (good choice of words, there!) coming up with any constructive solutions to the smallest of our big problems. That really sucks since we have big problems on top of the small ones.

So -say what you like (or not) against Obama, he did appear to represent a clear cutoff of Bush/Cheney policies. That is, except for the problem areas. We are still sending military people to Iraq and Afghanistan, there are still prisoners in Guantanamo, and his administration continues to support the application of a blanket "national security" claim to stop trials of suspected terrorists, leaving the hapless suspects imprisoned on unknown and unknowable evidence. Did we get fooled again? Were "The Who" wrong about that?

View as RSS news feed in XML