enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Page 1 of 2 (23 items)   1 2 Next >
The Banality of Idiocy
by Gatewood
+1 Reply

Currently there is an intellectual faction re-examining Hannah Arendt and the intellectual aspect of her relationship with her longtime Nazi-sycophant lover, the philosopher Martin Heidegger. This is leading to a reinterpretation of The Banality of evil, a phrase coined by Hannah Arendt and incorporated in the title of her 1963 work Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil.

Slate article writer, Ron Rosenbaum, says, specifically “a further discrediting of the most overused, misused, abused pseudo-intellectual phrase in our language: the banality of evil. The banality of the banality of evil, the fatuousness of it, has long been fathomless, but perhaps now it will be consigned to the realm of the deceitful and disingenuous as well.”

Here’s the link. Knock your socks off if you want to watch a passel of intellectuals perform the equivalent of intellectual masturbation. <link>

Now to MY point, they do this sort of stuff on a routine basis, our intellectuals, specifically those who drive the cutting edge of culture because their idiocy gets all the press and their every utterance is taken as intellectual gospel, and if it has ZERO relationship to common sense it is literally worshipped as the new word of God from their fellow [ironically] agnostics and atheists. Did NOBODY examine the clever catch phrase The Banality of Evil for intellectual gravitas BEFORE it became the utterance dejure for a generation of pseudo intellectuals too lazy to actually think for themselves? No, it did not!

Well . . . that’s not precisely true. People DID point out that there’s really nothing banal about evil or its source. It can be ironic, sure, and it can be relatively small, yes, but banal? While I generally discourage clinging to dictionary definitions in regards to popularly used terms, let’s dig up a reasonably accurate definition of the word as these elitists used its meaning: Common in a boring way, to the point of being predictable; containing nothing new or fresh.

When facing the Nazi gas chambers or being worked to death on starvation rations and living in hideous conditions simply because you are not one of the master race then there is NOTHING common in a boring way, to the point of being predictable; containing nothing new or fresh about it! People DID point that out to the intellectual elites at the time but did so using mere common sense and historical data and first hand accounts, sources spurned by such people.

Such sources are ALWAYS spurned by intellectual elites who WANT to glom onto the newest intellectual fad to flitter out of universities or their cocktail circuits [frequently the same thing].

So NOW, about forty-five years AFTER the phrase The Banality of Evil has done its damage throughout the world because intellectual elites just ADORE embracing catch phrases without ever applying common sense to the process, only NOW are our intellectuals considering catching up with people in possession of common sense and meaningful life experiences. Then they wonder why they are so often mocked.

You have to have intellectual elites and you need to pay attention to what they say and frequently you need to heed them and change your evil [or at least unthinkingly banal] and wicked ways for the better as a result, but you need also to be aware that these are the same people who first EMBRACED the phrase The Banality of Evil as a freaking UNIVERSAL TRUTH and therefore are never to be blindly trusted to be able to distinguish between shit and Shinola when it really counts.

So . . . while it turns out that The Banality of Evil is being re-examined, the concept of The Banality of Idiocy does definitely apply to this nation’s intellectual elites. What harm they cause while being routinely intellectually banal in a common and boring way, to the point of being predictable; containing nothing new or fresh about it.

Re: The Banality of Idiocy
by mOOnbirdShadow
Are you suffering the constipation for long time? Full of shits!!
Until you mentioned this title...
by Woolley
I had forgotten it entirely along with most of what I learned in college. But now that you have brought this extremely dangerous idea back and revealed its dire consequences, the dark power it holds, the ubiquitous influence it has and the hidden sources of evil it produces, well, I just have to admit that this title has really shaped the world as we know it. Astounding that a simple phrase could do so much. Thank you for warning me about intellectuals such as these, they really are a scourge upon our great species.
Such banal sarcasm.
by Gatewood
Nice try, though.
Nothing banal about
by Gatewood
your reply. Common as hell but in no way intellectual. Two thumbs up. Well done!
The banality of Gatewood
by Acrophony
People who have intellectual muscles to flex do so in all kinds of ways. Some of those attempts are mis-directed most are not. So what? What could be a more banal point to make then that some intellectuals are merely snobs? I can't thank of a more banal thing to say. One might even refrain from saying it, it is so obvious. If that someone were someone other than you, that is. You have a problem keeping your mouth shut, don't you?
Sorry, too banal.
by Gatewood
But thanks for trying anyway.
as a lapsed jew, i suppose i should . . .
by baltimore aureole

care about this more than i actually do

but if i had a choice between deconstructing where hannah arendt got her quotes 60 years ago, or worrying about what iran, syria, and al qaeda are up to, guess which gets my attention?

i don't think the world is going to be made a safer place by trying to engage anti-semites in a discussion about hannah arendt's internalized and subconscioius motivations

Agreed, and there's
by Gatewood

nothing banal about your observation.

It's all picking at nits and slicing hairs. It's pointless and a favorite habit of academicians and their groupies. It's their groupies in the press and elsewhere, as a matter of fact, that go on to make intellectual banality an international credo after the fact.

(Some) intellectuals deserve to be mocked
by anxious_mofo
But you never get around to telling us what it is that you disagree with in the phrase, other than a disconnect between evil and the dictionary definition of banal. I don't have any desire to defend Arendt, but your post is a lot of fulmination without much on what, specifically, you're fulminatin' against.

I don't have a problem with intellectuals in general, but I'd like to see postmodernism make its way into the proverbial dustbin of history. That, and I think a little bit more triumphalism and chest-beating w.r.t. to Western culture is in order: Western culture is pretty awesome, what with science, democracy, and a kick-ass tradition of art and literature. Finally, I'd prefer that moral and aesthetic relativism be crushed into little teeny bits and stomped on.
history is written by the victors
by baltimore aureole

thats reassuring when the victors are democracies which favor human rights and free markets

which explains why countries like saudi arabia, egypt, syria, and iran - which are NOT democracies and don't respect human rights - teach their kids a view of world history which is unrelated to reality

The Redundancy of ...
by SpeakerNancy

Acro. Yet another sniping reply post from A. Phony to Cicero / Gatewood and still, no evidence of Acro's own writing abilities as evidenced in his Missing Body of Work:

No Top Posts.

Come on, Acro -- you are capable, are you not? If not, well, just keep on dissing those who can write -- and apparently, think -- better than you can.

I.e., as my Dad used to say from time to time, "Put up or shut up." (Maybe you could do a limerick or two, for Gatewood?)

Moral relativism is here to stay, a-m...
by SpeakerNancy

I don't see it getting crushed into little teeny bits & getting stomped on, anytime soon. What would be some prime examples, to your way of thinking, of (let's say, 20th Century to now...) moral relativism?

And for esthetics, do you think there are -- or should be -- fixed examples of esthetic principles? (Not sure that I do, beyond a certain level of competence & performance.) Agree that some postmodernism is annoying but I'm thinking mostly of literary & art world examples of same, whereas I think you're discussing philosopher/thinkers. And yes, Western culture is pretty awesome, indeed -- but again, looking at art history & art world examples, so is Asian culture and (historically, mostly that I know of) Middle Eastern culture.

Good post, thanks.

And you?
by Acrophony
All you ever talk about is Over There. I don't see any top posts about anything else emanating from your fingertips. It strikes me that you're a little obsessed with Them. Sucks to not being invited to play with the smart kids, no? I wonder how the people over here feel about your completely transparent jealousy of those who've been embraced Over There. Anyhoo...you can take my lack of recent top posts as indicative of whatever you like. If you're inferring (big word...look it up) that my lack of top posts means something about the quality of Gatewood's posts then you need to go back to inference school. Just because some people don't top post as often doesn't make him good, it just makes him productive. The lack of ability to censor oneself has never been taken as a sign of intelligence.
Temper, temper! My latest Top Post ...
by SpeakerNancy

about Ryerson's cowardly retreat to "Shameful Conduct" Fray and asking "Is the BOTF dead?" now has 297 views, 11 replies and more than 20 - 25 posts in the discussion. And the "Report from the "Enemy" Front" has far more than that, as well. (Jealous?) And about two weeks ago, I did a Top Post about the first woman to win the Nobel Prize in Economics -- did the Geezeroid Country Club smoke signals network somehow miss that one?

You should do as well, I would imagine. As to "inferring," I know well what it means and if you really ever read my posts, rather than skimming and immediately going on auto-attack, you would know that my grammar is excellent, as is my spelling.

Grow up, little boy; you're a mere Fray-toddler. As fo the smart kids, there are still plenty of them Over Here & my lack of a welcome Over There has nothing to do with my intelligence, you dolt. It's personal & it goes back, years. Why don't you just hang out Over There, exclusively, yourself? Because none of them respond to you, is that it?

How was your Halloween candy? Hope your folks let you keep all of it. (You could use the sugar.) You could also, simply stop reading / skimming my posts, A. Phony.

Page 1 of 2 (23 items)   1 2 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML