questions.

"Speaker Gingrich..........you supported candidate Scozzofava throughout the campaign up until today. Is it possible that you are now for candidate Hoffman to shield yourself from accusations of deliberately trying to throw the race to the DEM candidate?.........like Scozzofava has with her endorsement today?"

PS......"Mr. Speaker........I'm right here........if you don't like the implication."

Now that's how these questions should be asked.

Newt was wrong. Plain and simple. I believe he was just trying to unite the GOP and keep it from spreading its votes all over the place. Turns out that it's not the right thing to unite the GOP under the Democrat tent and since Scozzafava was a RINO (and really a Dem anyway) that's where he was trying to unite his party. He was wrong and I hope he realizes it and moves on to a place where he's no longer in the wrong.

substantive. We'll know if he was right to initially support Scozzafuzzi if a bunch of GOP-killing third party candidacies break out.

is most enjoyable

There's no scenario that's right to support Scuzzyfuckbox.

And Newt just threw gasoline on his worst nightmare.

Dishonesty and prostitution for the sake of power........are never a good strategy.

Isn't Hoffman the other repub candidate? Isn't Newt a repub? Don't party members generally endorse people from their own party, even after their first choice is no longer in the race?

And lastly, are you really this stupid?