But why would this doom the public option?
by
la savante
10/30/2009, 6:16 PM #
I understand what Noah’s saying. Really. I do. But if a primary goal of health insurance reform is to cover almost everyone—including people who have preexisting conditions and therefore either can’t get insurance at any price or can’t get it for a price that they can afford—why isn’t it a good thing to have a public plan that would guarantee them access at a price that, at worst, is only slightly above the price that healthy people pay to for-profit insurance companies, and much less than they would pay to private insurance companies?
If there is no public option available to them, and private insurers are forced to accept them, then wouldn’t that raise the overall private-insurance premium rates?
The main problem with the public option as it appears in the current bills is that so few people will have access to it. If instead, everyone has the option to join it, whether individually or through their employer, then it indeed would cost its members less than private-sector insurance would, and it would put competitive cost pressures on the for-profit insurers.