If a women's sports league fell in the forest...
by
MonsterDog
10/21/2009, 1:09 AM #
Allow me the luxury of quoting myself:
If a WNBA Finals all-the-marbles game falls in the forest, and nobody's
around to see or hear it, did it make a sound? With all the talk of
cost-cutting during the recession, what's another couple hundred
women's basketball players in the grand scheme of tens of millions of
Americans out of work? Stern needs to take a long look at doing what's
right for his owners, and that means quitting the subsidy game. If
America wants women's basketball so much, let the government
nationalize it like they want to nationalize everything else that can't
stand on its own two feet.
The simple fact of the WNBA is that it exists because rich men want to spend a little throwaway money (a couple million a year in losses is chump change to them) to look like they care about gender equity, possibly at the behest of their wives or because they have daughters.
Is this really what women want? Rah-rah boosterism that's entirely dependent on the men who hold the real power in order to have relevance or any sense of self? That sounds like a mighty weak excuse for feminism, like gender codependency dressed up Monty Python-style to scratch out "domestic inferior to a dominant man" and write in "strong, independent woman".
C'mon, women. I'm as misogynistic, dominant, and "get in the kitchen" as any man on earth and even I think this is demeaning.